The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Kinetics and mechanism of the water-gas shift reaction catalysed by the clean and Cs-promoted Cu(110) surface: a comparison with Cu(111)
Abstract
The structural sensitivity of the water-gas shift (WGS) reaction (CO + H2O → H2+ CO2) over metallic copper is addressed here by comparing its kinetics over the atomically clean Cu(110) surface with prior results for Cu(111). The surfaces were prepared and characterized with UHV surface analysis (AES, LEED, XPS), then transferred to an attached microreactor for medium-pressure [10–1000 Torr (1 Torr = 101 325/760 Pa)] kinetic measurements and finally returned to UHV for post-reaction surface analysis. For both surfaces, the rate is nearly first-order in H2O pressure and zero-order in CO. Depending upon the temperature, Cu(110) is four- to ten-fold more active than the more densely packed Cu(111) surface. The apparent activation energy is also ca. 7 kcal mol–1(1 cal = 4.184 J) lower on Cu(110). This is attributed to a lower barrier for O—H bond cleavage in the rate-determining step: i.e. the dissociative adsorption of water. Strong evidence for a ‘surface redox’ mechanism involving oxygen adatoms is provided by comparing the known kinetics of reverse WGS with the rate of dissociative CO2 adsorption on Cu(110). A potential-energy diagram is presented which explains the known kinetics and energetics for the elementary steps as occurring in the forward or reverse direction, as well as the overall WGS reaction on clean Cu(110). The influence of adsorbed Cs on the reaction kinetics is also presented, and compared to earlier results on Cs/Cu(111). In both cases, Cs strongly accelerates the reaction. In the case of Cu(110), the rate-determining step is even changed. The reaction mechanism involves Cs · CO3, a and Cs · Oa.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bruix, A., Rodriguez, J. A., Ramírez, P. J., Senanayake, S. D., Evans, J., Park, J. B., Stacchiola, D., Liu, P., Hrbek, J., & Illas, F. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja302070k · Cited by 839
Kinetics of the Low-Temperature WGS Reaction over a CuO/ZnO/Al2O3 Catalyst
Ayastuy, J. L., Gutiérrez-Ortiz, M. A., González-Marcos, J. A., Aranzabal, A., & González-Velasco, J. R. (2005) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie049886w · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Nakamura, J., Campbell, J. M., & Campbell, C. T.
- Venue
- Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 2725
- ISSN
- 0956-5000 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5455
- OpenAlex
- W1997719209
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kinetics and mechanism of the water-gas shift reaction catalysed by the clean and Cs-promoted Cu(110) surface: a comparison with Cu(111). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/ft9908602725
- The paper
- Nakamura, J., Campbell, J. M., & Campbell, C. T. (1990). Kinetics and mechanism of the water-gas shift reaction catalysed by the clean and Cs-promoted Cu(110) surface: a comparison with Cu(111). Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions. https://doi.org/10.1039/ft9908602725
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.