Ion exchange in zeolites. Part 1.—Prediction of Ca 2+ –Na + equilibria in zeolites X and Y
Abstract
Exchange of Ca2+ in zeolites NaX and NaY was investigated with special emphasis on prediction of Ca2+–Na+ exchange equilibria over a wide range of ion concentrations in solution. Predictions were good for moderate and higher concentrations, but poor for dilute solutions. This was caused by the strong decrease in selectivities of the zeolites, at a given composition, with increasing dilution of th solution. Re-examination of ion-exchange data of earlier workers implied that this phenomenon, which is inconsistent with current theories of ion exchange, is more common in zeolites than hitherto suspected. The effects of salt imbibition, concurrent hydronium ion exchange and dissolution of the zeolites on the selectivity decrease of the zeolites were considered. None of these could be shown to be responsible for the phenomenon observed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ion-exchange isotherm measurements face an important problem when dealing with dilute ion solutions and low silica zeolites: introducing sodium-exchanged A, X, or Y zeolites into pure water causes almost immediate alkalinization of the aqueous phase due to slow exchange of sodium cations with hydronium cations.
“It must be noted that ion-exchange isotherm measurements face an important problem when dealing with dilute ion solutions and low silica zeolites. Introducing sodium-exchanged A, X, or Y zeolites into pure water will cause an almost immediate alkalinization of the aqueous phase due to the slow exchange of sodium cations with hydronium cations,180,181 as follows from”
From Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [180]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects
Pérez-Botella, E., Valencia, S., & Rey, F. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00140 · Cited by 1,126 · see citing works
- Authors
- Harjula, R., Dyer, A., Pearson, S. D., & Townsend, R. P.
- Venue
- J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans.
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1591-1597
- ISSN
- 0956-5000 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2022494558
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Chemical Society Faraday Transactions (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Chemical Synthesis and Characterization
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Keywords
- ion exchange, zeolites, NaX, NaY, calcium ion exchange, sodium ion exchange, exchange selectivity, dilute solutions, zeolite dissolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review