Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 438

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hydrogen bonding. Part 10. A scale of solute hydrogen-bond basicity using log K values for complexation in tetrachloromethane

Abraham, Michael H., Grellier, Priscilla L., Prior, David V., Morris, Jeffrey J., Taylor, Peter J.·1990·Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2

Abstract

A scale of solute hydrogen-bond basicity has been set up using log K values for the complexation of a series of bases (i) against a number of reference acids in dilute solution in tetrachloromethane, equation (i). log Ki=LA log KBHi+DA(i)Thirty-four such linear equations have been solved to yield LA and DA values that characterise the acids, and log KBH values that characterise the base; all the thirty-four equations intersect at a point where log K=–1.1 with K on the molar scale. This primary set of log KBH values involved 215 bases, and through a large number of secondary values we have been able to determine log KBH for some 500 bases, that include nearly all the functional groups encountered in organic chemistry. By making use of the ‘magic point,’ we have transformed log KBH into an entirely equivalent, but more convenient, scale through equation (ii). β2H=(log KBH+ 1.1)/4.636 (ii)Since we can take β2H= 0 for all non-basic compounds such as alkanes and cycloalkanes, the new β2H hydrogen-bond solute basicity scale covers virtually all classes of base.We show that β2H is not generally related to measures of full proton-transfer basicity such as aqueous pK or gaseous proton affinity (Epa) values, although family dependence is observed, and we stress that solute hydrogen-bond basicity must not be equated with full proton-transfer basicity. We also briefly investigate the solvent dependence of the β2H values in terms of the Maria–Gal θ-value, and we point out a number of exclusions to the ‘reasonably general’β2H scale.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/p29900000521

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 438

Metadata

Authors
Abraham, M. H., Grellier, P. L., Prior, D. V., Morris, J. J., & Taylor, P. J.
Venue
Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2
Published
1990
Issue
4
Pages
521
ISSN
  • 0300-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-5471
OpenAlex
W2093938060
Cited by
438
References
6
FWCI
8.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrogen bonding. Part 10. A scale of solute hydrogen-bond basicity using log K values for complexation in tetrachloromethane. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/p29900000521
The paper
Abraham, M. H., Grellier, P. L., Prior, D. V., Morris, J. J., & Taylor, P. J. (1990). Hydrogen bonding. Part 10. A scale of solute hydrogen-bond basicity using log K values for complexation in tetrachloromethane. Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2. https://doi.org/10.1039/p29900000521

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.