The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hydrogen bonding. Part 13. A new method for the characterisation of GLC stationary phases—the laffort data set
Abstract
A number of equations for the correlation of retention data for a series of solutes on a given stationary phase (or solvent) have been investigated with the aim of characterising stationary phases. The two most successful equations are, SP =c+dδ2+sπ2*+aα2H+bβ2H+I log L16(a), SP =c+rR2+sπ2*+aα2H+bβ2H+I log L16(b) In the present case the dependent variable SP is log L– log LDecane and the explanatory variables are solute parameters as follows: δ2 is an empirical polarisability correction term, R2 is a polarisability parameter that reflects the ability of a solute to interact with a solvent through π and n electron pairs, α2H is the solute hydrogen–bond acidity, β2H is the solute hydrogen–bond basicity, π2* is the solute dipolarity/polarisability, and L16 is the Ostwald solubility coefficient of the solute on n-hexadecane at 298 K. The constants c, r, s, a, b, and l in the more useful equation (b) are found by the method of multiple linear regression analysis, and serve to characterise a solvent phase in terms of specific solute/solvent interactions. Application of equation (b) to the five stationary phases examined by Laffort et al. shows that the magnitude of these constants is in accord with general chemical principles, and that the present procedure constitutes a new, general method for the characterisation of gas chromatographic stationary phases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Determination of sets of solute descriptors from chromatographic measurements
Abraham, M. H., Ibrahim, A., & Zissimos, A. M. (2004) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2003.12.004 · Cited by 891
Self-citationApplications of Polyparameter Linear Free Energy Relationships in Environmental Chemistry
Endo, S., & Goss, K.-U. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es503369t · Cited by 302
Hydrogen Bonding. 33. Factors That Influence the Distribution of Solutes between Blood and Brain
Abraham, M. H., Chadha, H. S., & Mitchell, R. C. (1994) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.2600830915 · Cited by 301
Self-citationHladky, S. B., & Barrand, M. A. (2018) · Fluids and Barriers of the CNS · doi:10.1186/s12987-018-0113-6 · Cited by 206
Abraham, M. H., Gola, J. M. R., Cometto-Muñiz, J. E., & Cain, W. S. (2001) · Fluid Phase Equilibria · doi:10.1016/s0378-3812(00)00511-2 · Cited by 29
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Abraham, M. H., Whiting, G. S., Doherty, R. M., & Shuely, W. J.
- Venue
- J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 1990
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1451-1460
- ISSN
- 0300-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5471
- OpenAlex
- W2081279549
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrogen bonding. Part 13. A new method for the characterisation of GLC stationary phases—the laffort data set. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/p29900001451
- The paper
- Abraham, M. H., Whiting, G. S., Doherty, R. M., & Shuely, W. J. (1990). Hydrogen bonding. Part 13. A new method for the characterisation of GLC stationary phases—the laffort data set. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2. https://doi.org/10.1039/p29900001451
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.