The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Identification of the differential distribution patterns of mRNAs and consensus binding sequences for mouse DAF-16 homologues
Open accessAbstract
daf-16 is a forkhead-type transcription factor, functioning downstream of insulin-like signals, and is known to be critical to the regulation of life span in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mammalian DAF-16 homologues include AFX, FKHR and FKHRL1, which contain a conserved forkhead domain and three putative phosphorylation sites for the Ser/Thr kinase Akt/protein kinase B (PKB), as well as for DAF-16. To assess the function of the homologues, we examined tissue distribution patterns of mRNAs for DAF-16 homologues in mice. In the embryos, expressions of AFX, FKHR and FKHRL1 mRNAs were complementary to each other and were highest in muscle, adipose tissue and embryonic liver. The characteristic expression pattern remained in the adult, except that signals of FKHRL1 became evident in more tissues, including the brain. In order to clarify whether each DAF-16 homologue had different target genes, we determined the consensus sequences for the binding of DAF-16 and the mouse homologues. The binding sequences for all four proteins shared a core sequence, TTGTTTAC, daf-16 family protein-binding element (DBE) binding protein. However, electrophoretic mobility shift assay showed that the binding affinity of DAF-16 homologues to the core sequence was stronger than that to the insulin-responsive element in the insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 promoter region, which has been identified as a binding sequence for them. We identified one copy of the DBE upstream of the first exon of sod-3 by searching the genomic database of C. elegans. Taken together, DAF-16 homologues can fundamentally regulate the common target genes in insulin-responsive tissues and the specificity to target genes of each protein is partially determined by the differences in their expression patterns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sandri, M., Sandri, C., Gilbert, A., Skurk, C., Calabria, E., Picard, A., Walsh, K., Schiaffino, S., Lecker, S. H., & Goldberg, A. L. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00400-3 · Cited by 3,012
Genes that act downstream of DAF-16 to influence the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans
Murphy, C. T., McCarroll, S. A., Bargmann, C. I., Fraser, A., Kamath, R. S., Ahringer, J., Li, H., & Kenyon, C. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01789 · Cited by 2,280
Forkhead transcription factor FOXO3a protects quiescent cells from oxidative stress
Kops, G. J. P. L., Dansen, T. B., Polderman, P. E., Saarloos, I., Wirtz, K. W. A., Coffer, P. J., Huang, T.-T., Bos, J. L., Medema, R. H., & Burgering, B. M. T. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01036 · Cited by 1,580
Regulation of aging and age-related disease by DAF-16 and heat-shock factor
Hsu, A.-L., Murphy, C. T., & Kenyon, C. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1083701 · Cited by 1,513
FOXO transcription factors at the interface between longevity and tumor suppression
Greer, E. L., & Brunet, A. (2005) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1209086 · Cited by 1,310
Metadata
- Authors
- Furuyama, T., Nakazawa, T., Nakano, I., & Mori, N.
- Venue
- Biochemical Journal
- Publisher
- Portland Press
- Published
- 2000-07-10
- Volume
- 349
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 629-629
- ISSN
- 0264-6021 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976050844
- Cited by
- 671
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of the differential distribution patterns of mRNAs and consensus binding sequences for mouse DAF-16 homologues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1042/0264-6021:3490629
- The paper
- Furuyama, T., Nakazawa, T., Nakano, I., & Mori, N. (2000). Identification of the differential distribution patterns of mRNAs and consensus binding sequences for mouse DAF-16 homologues. Biochemical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1042/0264-6021%3A3490629
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.