The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Elicitation of plants and microbial cell systems
Abstract
Plants show physiological and morphological responses to a range of physical and chemical factors known as ‘elicitors’. These responses have been considered as defence reactions ‘elicited’ by the plants’ biochemical factory to ensure their survival, persistence and competitiveness. Recently examples have been cited of elicitation in some fungal and bacterial cultures. Through a chronological survey, this Review considers examples of elicitors and elicitation and describes suggested mechanisms of elicitation in plants and microbial cell cultures. The majority of research in this field has been carried out on the plant systems using complex (undefined) biotic elicitors. Carbohydrates are the main class of compounds used as defined elicitors. This Review focuses on carbohydrates as compounds initiating a defence response in cell cultures. Physiological changes brought about on the plant and microbial cultures include expression of novel metabolites and overproduction of already known products. Recent reports confirming elicitation in microbial cultures are of potential importance, as the relative ease of fermentation and scale‐up could open an opportunity for the introduction of useful novel metabolites as well as enhancement of commercially useful bioproducts. In this context, a sound knowledge of the elicitor molecules’ structure–function relationships and mechanisms of elicitation is essential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sharp, J. K., Valent, B., & Albersheim, P. (1984) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)90864-1 · Cited by 295
Sharp, J. K., McNeil, M., & Albersheim, P. (1984) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)90865-3 · Cited by 261
Manipulation of the morphogenetic pathways of tobacco explants by oligosaccharins
Tran Thanh Van, K., Toubart, P., Cousson, A., Darvill, A. G., Gollin, D. J., Chelf, P., & Albersheim, P. (1985) · Nature · doi:10.1038/314615a0 · Cited by 212
Cited by
(2007) · Pharmacognosy Reviews/Bioinformatics Trends/Pharmacognosy review · Cited by 522
Chemical Characteristics and Functional Properties of Chitosan
Lizardi-Mendoza, J., Argüelles Monal, W. M., & Goycoolea Valencia, F. M. (2016) · Chitosan in the Preservation of Agricultural Commodities · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802735-6.00001-x · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Radman, R., Saez, T., Bucke, C., & Keshavarz, T.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-102
- ISSN
- 0885-4513 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-8744
- OpenAlex
- W2094778259
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.