The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tissue fractionation studies. 4. Comparative study of the binding of acid phosphatase, β-glucuronidase and cathepsin by rat-liver particles
Open accessAbstract
Research Article| March 01 1955 Tissue fractionation studies. 4. Comparative study of the binding of acid phosphatase, β-glucuronidase and cathepsin by rat-liver particles R. Gianetto; R. Gianetto * 1Department of Physiological Chemistry, University of Louvain, Belgium Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar C. De Duve C. De Duve 1Department of Physiological Chemistry, University of Louvain, Belgium Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Biochem J (1955) 59 (3): 433–438. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0590433 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Cite Icon Cite Get Permissions Citation R. Gianetto, C. De Duve; Tissue fractionation studies. 4. Comparative study of the binding of acid phosphatase, β-glucuronidase and cathepsin by rat-liver particles. Biochem J 1 March 1955; 59 (3): 433–438. doi: https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0590433 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsBiochemical Journal Search Advanced Search This content is only available as a PDF. © 1955 CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS1955 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Proteolysis: from the lysosome to ubiquitin and the proteasome
Ciechanover, A. (2005) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1552 · Cited by 1,133
ANALYTICAL STUDY OF MICROSOMES AND ISOLATED SUBCELLULAR MEMBRANES FROM RAT LIVER
Beaufay, H., Amar-Costesec, A., Feytmans, E., Thinès-Sempoux, D., Wibo, M., Robbi, M., & Berthet, J. (1974) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.61.1.188 · Cited by 834
Isolation and Characterization of Calcifying Matrix Vesicles from Epiphyseal Cartilage
Ali, S. Y., Sajdera, S. W., & Anderson, H. C. (1970) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.67.3.1513 · Cited by 575
Deter, R. L., & de Duve, C. (1967) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.33.2.437 · Cited by 538
Self-citationCiechanover, A. (2005) · Cell Death & Differentiation · doi:10.1038/sj.cdd.4401692 · Cited by 462
Metadata
- Authors
- Gianetto, R., & De Duve, C.
- Venue
- Biochemical Journal
- Publisher
- Portland Press Ltd.
- Published
- 1955-03-01
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 433-438
- ISSN
- 0306-3283 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2415205045
- Cited by
- 883
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tissue fractionation studies. 4. Comparative study of the binding of acid phosphatase, β-glucuronidase and cathepsin by rat-liver particles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1042/bj0590433
- The paper
- Gianetto, R., & De Duve, C. (1955). Tissue fractionation studies. 4. Comparative study of the binding of acid phosphatase, β-glucuronidase and cathepsin by rat-liver particles. Biochemical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0590433
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
