The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The purification and properties of the C1 component of Trichoderma koningii cellulase
Open accessAbstract
1. The C1 component that was isolated from a Trichoderma koningii cellulase preparation (Wood, 1968) by chromatography on DEAE-Sephadex with a salt gradient was still associated with a trace of CM-cellulase activity (determined by reducing-sugar and viscometric methods). 2. Further chromatography on DEAE-Sephadex, with a pH gradient instead of a salt gradient, provided a C1 component that could still produce reducing sugars from a solution of CM-cellulose (to a very limited extent), but which could no longer decrease the viscosity (i.e. under the assay conditions employed). 3. No evidence for the non-identity of C1 component and the trace of CM-cellulase activity could be found when electrofocusing was done in a stabilized pH gradient covering three pH units (pH3–6) or, alternatively, only 0.5 pH unit (pH3.72–4.25). 4. The two protein peaks that were separated by electrofocusing in carrier ampholytes covering only 0.5 pH unit (isoelectric pH values of 3.80 and 3.95) were shown to be isoenzymes of the C1 component: they differed in the extent to which they were associated with carbohydrate (9% and 33%). 5. The purified C1 component had little ability to attack CM-cellulose or highly ordered forms of cellulose, but degraded phosphoric acid-swollen cellulose readily: cellobiose was the principal product of the hydrolysis (97%). 6. Dewaxed cotton fibre was degraded to the extent of 15% when exposed to high concentrations of C1 component over a prolonged period: cellobiose was again the principal sugar present in the supernatant (96%). 7. Cellotetraose and cellohexaose were hydrolysed almost exclusively to cellobiose. 8. Evidence indicates that the C1 component is a β-1,4-glucan cellobiosylhydrolase.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Substrate and Enzyme Characteristics that Limit Cellulose Hydrolysis
Mansfield, S. D., Mooney, C., & Saddler, J. N. (1999) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1021/bp9900864 · Cited by 869
Payne, C. M., Knott, B. C., Mayes, H. B., Hansson, H., Himmel, M. E., Sandgren, M., Ståhlberg, J., & Beckham, G. T. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500351c · Cited by 855
Van Tilbeurgh, H., Tomme, P., Claeyssens, M., Bhikhabhai, R., & Pettersson, G. (1986) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/0014-5793(86)80816-x · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Wood, T. M., & McCrae, S. I.
- Venue
- Biochemical Journal
- Publisher
- Portland Press Ltd.
- Published
- 1972-08-01
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1183-1192
- ISSN
- 0306-3283 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2276201557
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The purification and properties of the C1 component of Trichoderma koningii cellulase. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1042/bj1281183
- The paper
- Wood, T. M., & McCrae, S. I. (1972). The purification and properties of the C1 component of Trichoderma koningii cellulase. Biochemical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj1281183
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.