The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A rapid method for the preparation of microvilli from rabbit kidney
Open accessAbstract
A simple method for the isolation of microvilli from kidney brush border is described. The method depends on the preferential aggregation of other subcellular structures by bivalent metal ions. MgCl2 is added to a homogenate of cortical tissue prepared from frozen rabbit kidneys. Aggregated material is removed by a low-speed centrifugation and the supernatant centrifuged at 15000g to yield a pellet enriched in microvilli. This is resuspended and given a second treatment with Mg2+. The purified preparation is obtained after four short differential centrifugations. The six brush-border enzymes that were monitored were enriched 11–17-fold compared with the original homogenate and were obtained in about 10% yield. Marker enzymes for other subcellular components showed the preparation to be essentially free of mitochondria and to be less contaminated with endoplasmic reticulum and baso-lateral plasma membranes than are conventional brush-border preparations. The main contamination was of lysosomal origin, about half of which was attributable to adsorbed acid hydrolases rather than to intact lysosomes. The aggregated components in the low-speed pellet bound less Mg2+than did the microvillus fraction. A possible mechanism for the role of Mg2+is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Purification of the human intestinal brush border membrane
Schmitz, J., Preiser, H., Maestracci, D., Ghosh, B. K., Cerda, J. J., & Crane, R. K. (1973) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/0005-2736(73)90434-3 · Cited by 792
Glycoproteins of Cell Surfaces
Glossmann, H., & Neville, D. M. (1971) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)61794-6 · Cited by 556
The purification and specificity of a neutral endopeptidase from rabbit kidney brush border
Kerr, M. A., & Kenny, A. J. (1974) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj1370477 · Cited by 460
Self-citationKerr, M. A., & Kenny, A. J. (1974) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj1370489 · Cited by 187
Self-citationIsolierung und enzymatische Charakterisierung einer B�rstensaumfraktion der Rattenniere
Kinne, R., & Kinne-Saffran, E. (1969) · Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1007/bf00588029 · Cited by 81
Cited by
Aronson, P. S., Nee, J., & Suhm, M. A. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/299161a0 · Cited by 688
Effect of inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate on isolated subcellular fractions of rat pancreas
Streb, H., Bayerdörffer, E., Haase, W., Irvine, R. F., & Schulz, I. (1984) · The Journal of Membrane Biology · doi:10.1007/bf01868717 · Cited by 311
Identification of two strains of MDCK cells which resemble separate nephron tubule segments
Richardson, J. C. W., Scalera, V., & Simmons, N. L. (1981) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/0304-4165(81)90307-x · Cited by 286
Hansen, G. H., Immerdal, L., Thorsen, E., Niels-Christiansen, L.-L., Nystrøm, B. T., Demant, E. J. F., & Danielsen, E. M. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m102667200 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Booth, A. G., & Kenny, A. J.
- Venue
- Biochemical Journal
- Publisher
- Portland Press Ltd.
- Published
- 1974-09-01
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 575-581
- ISSN
- 0264-6021 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1804060812
- Cited by
- 607
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A rapid method for the preparation of microvilli from rabbit kidney. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1042/bj1420575
- The paper
- Booth, A. G., & Kenny, A. J. (1974). A rapid method for the preparation of microvilli from rabbit kidney. Biochemical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj1420575
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.