The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of non-receptor-mediated uptake of cholesterol on intracellular cholesterol metabolism in human skin fibroblasts
Abstract
Unilamellar lipid vesicles of various cholesterol:phosphatidylcholine molar ratios were used to alter, via passive exchange at the plasma membrane, the cellular free cholesterol content of cultured human skin fibroblasts which had been preincubated in lipoprotein-deficient serum. The effects of these net surface transfers of cholesterol on cellular cholesterol biosynthesis, cholesterol esterification and low density lipoprotein (LDL) binding were determined and were compared with the effects of cholesterol delivered to the cell interior via the receptor-mediated endocytosis of LDL. Both LDL and cholesterol-rich lipid vesicles increased cell cholesterol within 6 h. Cells exposed to LDL also showed, within 6 h, decreased cholesterol synthesis, decreased LDL binding and increased cholesterol esterification. Cells incubated with the cholesterol-rich vesicles showed similar changes but these were delayed and did not occur until 24 h. Fibroblasts incubated with cholesterol-free phosphatidylcholine vesicles had decreased cell cholesterol, increased cholesterol synthesis, increased LDL binding, and decreased esterification, but only after 24 h of incubation. These results suggest that passive net transfers of cholesterol occurring at the cell surface can with time modulate intracellular cholesterol metabolism. These findings are consistent with the idea that the movement of cholesterol from the cell surface to the cell interior is a limited and relatively slow process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sterol-starved cells have lower cholesterol content than sterol-fed cells.
“Sterol-starved cells have lower cholesterol content than sterol-fed cells27,28.”
From Triciribine increases LDLR expression and LDL uptake through stabilization of LDLR mRNA (2018) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A RAPID METHOD OF TOTAL LIPID EXTRACTION AND PURIFICATION
Bligh, E. G., & Dyer, W. J. (1959) · Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology · doi:10.1139/o59-099 · Cited by 54,751
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Goldstein, J. L., Dana, S. E. & Brown, M. S. (1974) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71, 4288-4292
- Kaplan, M., DeGrella, R. & Simoni, R. D. (1984) Fed. Proc. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 43, 468a
- Mills, J. T., Furlong, S. T. & Dawidowicz, E. A. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81, 1385-1388
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Triciribine increases LDLR expression and LDL uptake through stabilization of LDLR mRNA
Bjune, K., Wierød, L., & Naderi, S. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-34237-6 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Robertson, D. L., & Poznansky, M. J.
- Venue
- Biochemical Journal
- Publisher
- Portland Press Ltd.
- Published
- 1985-12-01
- Volume
- 232
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 553-557
- ISSN
- 0264-6021
- 1470-8728
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review