The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA glycosylases in the base excision repair of DNA
Open accessAbstract
A wide range of cytotoxic and mutagenic DNA bases are removed by different DNA glycosylases, which initiate the base excision repair pathway. DNA glycosylases cleave the N-glycosylic bond between the target base and deoxyribose, thus releasing a free base and leaving an apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site. In addition, several DNA glycosylases are bifunctional, since they also display a lyase activity that cleaves the phosphodiester backbone 3′ to the AP site generated by the glycosylase activity. Structural data and sequence comparisons have identified common features among many of the DNA glycosylases. Their active sites have a structure that can only bind extrahelical target bases, as observed in the crystal structure of human uracil-DNA glycosylase in a complex with double-stranded DNA. Nucleotide flipping is apparently actively facilitated by the enzyme. With bacteriophage T4 endonuclease V, a pyrimidine-dimer glycosylase, the enzyme gains access to the target base by flipping out an adenine opposite to the dimer. A conserved helix–hairpin–helix motif and an invariant Asp residue are found in the active sites of more than 20 monofunctional and bifunctional DNA glycosylases. In bifunctional DNA glycosylases, the conserved Asp is thought to deprotonate a conserved Lys, forming an amine nucleophile. The nucleophile forms a covalent intermediate (Schiff base) with the deoxyribose anomeric carbon and expels the base. Deoxyribose subsequently undergoes several transformations, resulting in strand cleavage and regeneration of the free enzyme. The catalytic mechanism of monofunctional glycosylases does not involve covalent intermediates. Instead the conserved Asp residue may activate a water molecule which acts as the attacking nucleophile.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA
Lindahl, T. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/362709a0 · Cited by 5,679
Cited by
Tet-Mediated Formation of 5-Carboxylcytosine and Its Excision by TDG in Mammalian DNA
He, Y.-F., Li, B.-Z., Li, Z., Liu, P., Wang, Y., Tang, Q., Ding, J., Jia, Y., Chen, Z., Li, L., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1210944 · Cited by 2,770
UV-induced DNA damage and repair: a review
Sinha, R. P., & Häder, D.-P. (2002) · Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences · doi:10.1039/b201230h · Cited by 1,978
Oxidative Nucleobase Modifications Leading to Strand Scission
Burrows, C. J., & Muller, J. G. (1998) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr960421s · Cited by 1,736
Accumulation of premutagenic DNA lesions in mice defective in removal of oxidative base damage
Klungland, A., Rosewell, I., Hollenbach, S., Larsen, E., Daly, G., Epe, B., Seeberg, E., Lindahl, T., & Barnes, D. E. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.23.13300 · Cited by 807
Mutagenicity and repair of oxidative DNA damage: insights from studies using defined lesions
Wang, D., Kreutzer, D. A., & Essigmann, J. M. (1998) · Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/s0027-5107(98)00066-9 · Cited by 464
Metadata
- Authors
- KROKAN, H. E., STANDAL, R., & SLUPPHAUG, G.
- Venue
- Biochemical Journal
- Publisher
- Portland Press Ltd.
- Published
- 1997-07-01
- Volume
- 325
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-16
- ISSN
- 0264-6021 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-8728
- OpenAlex
- W1845321470
- Cited by
- 859
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA glycosylases in the base excision repair of DNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1042/bj3250001
- The paper
- KROKAN, H. E., STANDAL, R., & SLUPPHAUG, G. (1997). DNA glycosylases in the base excision repair of DNA. Biochemical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj3250001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.