Cited by 61

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanism and role of localized activation of Rho-family GTPases in growth factor-stimulated fibroblasts and neuronal cells

Kurokawa, K., Nakamura, T., Aoki, K., Matsuda, M.·2005·Biochemical Society Transactions

Abstract

Rho-family GTPases regulate various aspects of cell function by controlling cytoskeletal changes; however, their spatial regulation within the cells remains largely unknown. To understand this regulation, we have studied the spatiotemporal activity of Rho-family GTPases in migrating cells and growth factor-stimulated cells by using probes based on the principle of fluorescence resonance energy transfer. In migrating fibroblasts and epithelial cells, the level of RhoA activity is high both at the contractile tail and at the leading edge, whereas Rac1 and Cdc42 activities are high only at the leading edge. In cells stimulated with epidermal growth factor or nerve growth factor, activities of Rac1 and Cdc42 were transiently elevated in a broad area of the plasma membrane, followed by a localized activation at nascent lamellipodia. In contrast, on epidermal growth factor stimulation, RhoA activity decreased diffusely at the plasma membrane. Notably, RhoA activity persisted at the tip of growth factor-induced membrane ruffles and, in agreement with this finding, RhoA is required for membrane ruffling. These observations suggest that the activities of Rho-family GTPases are elaborately regulated in a time- and space-dependent manner to control cytoskeletal changes and that the basic mechanism of controlling cell shape via Rho-family GTPases is common to various cell types.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1042/bst0330631

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Etienne-Manneville, 2002, Nature (London), 420, 629, 10.1038/nature01148 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ridley, 2001, J. Cell Sci., 114, 2713, 10.1242/jcs.114.15.2713 · DOI
  3. Hall, 1998, Science, 279, 509, 10.1126/science.279.5350.509 · DOI
  4. Mitchison, 1996, Cell (Cambridge, Mass.), 84, 371, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81281-7 · DOI
  5. Jares-Erijman, 2003, Nat. Biotechnol., 21, 1387, 10.1038/nbt896 · DOI
  6. Pollok, 1999, Trends Cell Biol., 9, 57, 10.1016/S0962-8924(98)01434-2 · DOI
  7. Tsien, 1998, Science, 280, 1954, 10.1126/science.280.5371.1954 · DOI
  8. Graham, 2001, Anal. Biochem., 296, 208, 10.1006/abio.2001.5306 · DOI
  9. Itoh, 2002, Mol. Cell. Biol., 22, 6582, 10.1128/MCB.22.18.6582-6591.2002 · DOI
  10. Yoshizaki, 2003, J. Cell Biol., 162, 223, 10.1083/jcb.200212049 · DOI
  11. Kraynov, 2000, Science, 290, 333, 10.1126/science.290.5490.333 · DOI
  12. Kurokawa, 2004, Acta Histochem. Cytochem., 37, 347, 10.1267/ahc.37.347 · DOI
  13. Raftopoulou, 2004, Dev. Biol., 265, 23, 10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.06.003 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Xu, 2003, Cell (Cambridge, Mass.), 114, 201, 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00555-5 · DOI
  15. Alblas, 2001, Mol. Biol. Cell, 12, 2137, 10.1091/mbc.12.7.2137 · DOI
  16. Nobes, 1999, J. Cell Biol., 144, 1235, 10.1083/jcb.144.6.1235 · DOI
  17. Nalbant, 2004, Science, 305, 1615, 10.1126/science.1100367 · DOI
  18. Kurokawa, 2004, Mol. Biol. Cell, 15, 1003, 10.1091/mbc.e03-08-0609 · DOI
  19. Nimnual, 2003, Nat. Cell Biol., 5, 236, 10.1038/ncb938 · DOI
  20. Luo, 2000, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 1, 173, 10.1038/35044547 · DOI
  21. Aoki, 2005, Mol. Biol. Cell, 16, 2207, 10.1091/mbc.e04-10-0904 · DOI
  22. Aoki, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 713, 10.1074/jbc.M306382200 · DOI
  23. Yasui, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 15298, 10.1074/jbc.M008546200 · DOI
  24. Daniels, 1998, EMBO J., 17, 754, 10.1093/emboj/17.3.754 · DOI
  25. Katoh, 2000, Mol. Cell. Biol., 20, 7378, 10.1128/MCB.20.19.7378-7387.2000 · DOI
  26. Sarner, 2000, Mol. Cell. Biol., 20, 158, 10.1128/MCB.20.1.158-172.2000 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kurokawa, K., Nakamura, T., Aoki, K., & Matsuda, M.
Affiliations
Department of Tumor Virology, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Yamadaoka, Suita-shi, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
Venue
Biochemical Society Transactions
Published
2005-08-01
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
631-634
ISSN
  • 0300-5127
  • 1470-8752
Cited by
61
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review