Cited by 105Redox biology and oxidative stressNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms

Redox signalling involving NADPH oxidase-derived reactive oxygen species

Dworakowski, R., Anilkumar, N., Zhang, M., Shah, A.M.·2006·Biochemical Society Transactions

Abstract

Increased oxidative stress plays an important role in the pathophysiology of many diseases such as atherosclerosis, diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction and heart failure. In addition to the well-known damaging effects of oxygen-free radicals, ROS (reactive oxygen species) also have signalling roles, acting as second messengers that modulate the activity of diverse intracellular signalling pathways and transcription factors, thereby inducing changes in cell phenotype. NADPH oxidases appear to be especially important sources of ROS involved in redox signalling. Seven NADPH oxidase isoforms, known as Noxs (NAPDH oxidases), are expressed in a cell- and tissue-specific fashion. These oxidases are thought to subserve distinct functions as a result of their tightly regulated activation (e.g. by neurohormonal and growth factors and mechanical stimuli) and their specific coupling with distinct downstream signalling pathways. In the present paper, we review the structure and mechanisms of activation of NADPH oxidases and consider their involvement in redox signalling, focusing mainly on the cardiovascular system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1042/bst0340960

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • O2•− derived from different NOx influences distinct downstream signalling pathways, which may explain co-expression of more than one NOX isoform in specific cell types.

    “Additionally, O2•− derived from different NOx influences distinct downstream signalling pathways, which may be the reason for the co-expression of more than one isoform of NOX in specific cell types [173].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 105

Authors
Dworakowski, R., Anilkumar, N., Zhang, M., & Shah, A. M.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Venue
Biochemical Society Transactions
Published
2006-10-01
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
960-964
ISSN
  • 0300-5127 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-8752
OpenAlex
W2002003398
Cited by
105
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biochemical Society Transactions (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
Keywords
NADPH oxidase, NOX isoforms, reactive oxygen species, redox signaling, oxidative stress, NADPH oxidase activation, cardiovascular system, second messengers, transcription factors, atherosclerosis, heart failure, myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Heart Failure, Humans, Isoenzymes, Models, Molecular, Myocardial Infarction, NADP, Oxidation-Reduction, Phagocytosis, Protein Conformation, Signal Transduction, Reactive Oxygen Species, NADPH Oxidases, Atherosclerosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review