The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEA®s): stable and recyclable biocatalysts
Abstract
The key to obtaining an optimum performance of an enzyme is often a question of devising an effective method for its immobilization. In the present review, we describe a novel, versatile and effective methodology for enzyme immobilization as CLEAs (cross-linked enzyme aggregates). The method is exquisitely simple (involving precipitation of the enzyme from aqueous buffer followed by cross-linking of the resulting physical aggregates of enzyme molecules) and amenable to rapid optimization. We have shown it to be applicable to a wide variety of enzymes, including, in addition to a wide variety of hydrolases, lyases, e.g. nitrile hydratases and oxynitrilases, and oxidoreductases such as laccase and galactose oxidase. CLEAs are stable, recyclable catalysts exhibiting high catalyst productivities. Because the methodology is essentially a combination of purification and immobilization into one step, the enzyme does not need to be of high purity. The technique is also applicable to the preparation of combi-CLEAs, containing two or more enzymes, for use in one-pot, multistep syntheses, e.g. an oxynitrilase/nitrilase combi-CLEA for the one-pot conversion of benzaldehyde into (S)-mandelic acid, in high yield and enantiomeric purity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“There are many extensive reviews on methods and supports used for enzyme immobilisation 172, 173 focusing on a specific support (e.g. 174 ), immobilisation method (e.g. 175, 176 ) or enzyme (e.g. 177 ).”
From Degradation of anthraquinone dyes from effluents: A review focusing on enzymatic dye degradation with industrial potential (2020) · cites this paper as [176]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The typical enzyme content in the final product is usually less than 10 % by weight, remaining being the support 176 .”
From Degradation of anthraquinone dyes from effluents: A review focusing on enzymatic dye degradation with industrial potential (2020) · cites this paper as [176]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- Sheldon, 2000, Pure Appl. Chem., 72, 1233, 10.1351/pac200072071233 · DOI
- Cao, 2003, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 14, 387, 10.1016/S0958-1669(03)00096-X · DOI
- St. Clair, 1992, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114, 7314, 10.1021/ja00044a064 · DOI
- Margolin, 1996, Trends Biotechnol., 14, 223, 10.1016/0167-7799(96)10031-7 · DOI
- Lalonde, 1997, Chemtech, 27, 38
- Margolin, 2001, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 40, 2204, 10.1002/1521-3773(20010618)40:12<2204::AID-ANIE2204>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI
- Brown, 1966, Chem. Eng. Sci., 47, 1831
- Cao, 2000, Org. Lett., 2, 1361, 10.1021/ol005593x · DOI
- Cao, 2001, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 11, 665, 10.1016/S1381-1177(00)00078-3 · DOI
- Wegman, 2001, Adv. Synth. Catal., 343, 559, 10.1002/1615-4169(200108)343:6/7<559::AID-ADSC559>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
- van Langen, 2003, Adv. Synth. Catal., 345, 797, 10.1002/adsc.200303023 · DOI
- Lopez-Serrano, 2002, Biotechnol. Lett., 24, 1379, 10.1023/A:1019863314646 · DOI
- Theil, 2000, Tetrahedron, 56, 2905, 10.1016/S0040-4020(00)00041-7 · DOI
- Schoevaart, 2004, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 87, 754, 10.1002/bit.20184 · DOI
- Yu, 2006, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 43, 124, 10.1016/j.molcatb.2006.07.001 · DOI
- Hobbs, 2006, Green Chem., 8, 816, 10.1039/B604738F · DOI
- Dijkstra, 2007, J. Supercritical Fluids, 41, 102, 10.1016/j.supflu.2006.08.013 · DOI
- Ruiz Toral, 2007, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 40, 1095, 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.08.027 · DOI
- Mateo, 2004, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 86, 273, 10.1002/bit.20033 · DOI
- Sheldon, 2005, Biocat. Biotrans., 23, 141, 10.1080/10242420500183378 · DOI
- Sheldon, 2007, Chim. Oggi, 25, 48
- Miyazawa, 1999, Amino Acids, 16, 191, 10.1007/BF01388169 · DOI
- van Rantwijk, 2004, Tetrahedron, 60, 501, 10.1016/j.tet.2003.10.018 · DOI
- Zhang, 1996, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 19, 538, 10.1016/S0141-0229(96)00057-9 · DOI
- Bode, 2003, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 84, 710, 10.1002/bit.10828 · DOI
- O'Connel, 2006, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 134, 179, 10.1385/ABAB:134:2:179 · DOI
- Wilson, 2004, Biomacromolecules, 5, 814, 10.1021/bm034528i · DOI
- van Langen, 2005, Org. Lett., 7, 327, 10.1021/ol047647z · DOI
- Cabirol, 2006, Adv. Synth. Catal., 348, 1645, 10.1002/adsc.200606139 · DOI
- Chmura, 2006, Adv. Synth. Catal., 348, 1655, 10.1002/adsc.200606140 · DOI
- Roberge, 2007, Tetrahedron Lett., 48, 1473, 10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.12.053 · DOI
- DiCosimo, 2006, Biocatalysis in the Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Industries, 1
- Bruggink, 2003, Org. Proc. Res. Dev., 7, 622, 10.1021/op0340311 · DOI
- Mateo, 2006, Tetrahedron Asymm., 17, 320, 10.1016/j.tetasy.2006.01.020 · DOI
- Honda, 2006, Adv. Synth. Catal., 348, 2163, 10.1002/adsc.200606224 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Routoula, E., & Patwardhan, S. V. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b03737 · Cited by 579
Metadata
- Authors
- Sheldon, R. A.
- Venue
- Biochemical Society Transactions
- Publisher
- Portland Press Ltd.
- Published
- 2007-11-23
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1583-1587
- ISSN
- 0300-5127
- 1470-8752
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review