Cited by 141DNA Repair MechanismsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsEffects of Radiation Exposure

53BP1: function and mechanisms of focal recruitment

Open access
FitzGerald, Jennifer E., Grenon, Muriel, Lowndes, Noel F.·2009·Biochemical Society Transactions

Abstract

53BP1 (p53-binding protein 1) is classified as a mediator/adaptor of the DNA-damage response, and is recruited to nuclear structures termed foci following genotoxic insult. In the present paper, we review the functions of 53BP1 in DNA-damage checkpoint activation and DNA repair, and the mechanisms of its recruitment and activation following DNA damage. We focus in particular on the role of covalent histone modifications in this process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1042/bst0370897

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In human cells, MDC1, 53BP1, and BRCA1 are candidate functional Rad9 orthologues and may all be considered Rad9 orthologues.

    “In human cells, the identity of the functional Rad9 orthologue is still debated: multiple candidates exist – i.e., MDC1 (mediator of DNA-damage checkpoint 1), 53BP1 (p53-binding protein 1) and BRCA1 (breast cancer 1 early-onset) – all characterized by the presence of tandem BRCT (BRCA1 C-terminal repeat) domains. Since these three proteins are involved in checkpoint signal transduction and each of”

    From Mind the gap: keeping UV lesions in check (2011) · cites this paper as [31]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 90 · Cited by 141

Authors
FitzGerald, J. E., Grenon, M., & Lowndes, N. F.
Affiliations
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
Venue
Biochemical Society Transactions
Published
2009-07-22
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
897-904
ISSN
  • 0300-5127 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-8752
OpenAlex
W2107029023
Cited by
141
References
90
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 18
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Biochemical Society Transactions (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin) (cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
Keywords
53BP1, DNA damage response, DNA damage checkpoint, DNA repair, DNA damage foci, histone modifications, p53-binding protein
MeSH terms
Tumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1, Animals, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, Histones, Humans, Models, Biological, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review