Cited by 34Memory and Neural MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Hippocampal synaptic activity, pattern separation and episodic-like memory: implications for mouse models of Alzheimer's disease pathology

Palmer, Alice, Good, Mark·2011·Biochemical Society Transactions

Abstract

The present review summarizes converging evidence from animal and human studies that an early target of amyloid pathology is synaptic activity in the DG (dentate gyrus)/CA3 network. We briefly review the computational significance of the DG/CA3 network in the encoding of episodic memory and present new evidence that the CA3/DG pattern of activation is compromised in a mouse model of amyloid pathology. In addition, we present a new behavioural method to test the prediction that amyloid-related synaptic pathology will disrupt the formation of an integrated episodic-like (what, where and when) memory in mice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1042/bst0390902

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mossy fiber "detonator" synapses arising from DG granule cells strongly activate the CA3 region and are involved in a variety of neurological functions, including memory and spatial representations.

    “Mossy fiber “detonator” synapses arising from DG granule cells strongly activate the CA3 region and are involved in a variety of neurological functions, including memory and spatial representations [6], [64].”
  • The preclinical period prior to the diagnosis of AD is characterized by deficits in a number of memory-related processes, including pattern separation.

    “The preclinical period prior to the diagnosis of AD is characterized by deficits in a number of memory-related processes, including pattern separation [64], [67].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palmer, A., & Good, M.
Affiliations
Cardiff University (GB)
Venue
Biochemical Society Transactions
Published
2011-07-20
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
902-909
ISSN
  • 0300-5127 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-8752
OpenAlex
W2137487902
Cited by
34
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biochemical Society Transactions (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
hippocampus, synaptic activity, pattern separation, episodic-like memory, Alzheimer's disease, amyloid pathology, dentate gyrus, CA3, episodic memory encoding, mouse model
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Hippocampus, Humans, Mice, Transgenic, Synaptic Transmission, Mental Recall, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review