The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bone Mineral Content of the Lumbar Spine in Normal and Osteoporotic Women: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Studies
Abstract
1. Bone mineral content of the second, third and fourth lumbar vertebrae was determined in normal women and women with clinical osteoporosis by using dual-photon (153Gd) absorptiometry. 2. A cross-sectional study of 70 normal women (aged 19–88 years) showed a bone loss of 44% from the age of around 34 years throughout life. 3. Longitudinal data from 59 normal women confirmed that the vertebral bone loss started before the menopause. An accelerated bone loss amounting to nearly 6% per year was seen immediately after the menopause. The bone loss of older women was slower. 4. Mean lumbar bone mineral content of 36 women (aged 48–93 years) with recent fractures of their femoral neck after minor trauma equalled that of age-matched normal women. Lumbar bone mineral content of the women with intratrochanteric femoral neck fractures was lower than that of the women with medial femoral neck fractures. 5. Mean lumbar bone mineral content of 72 women (aged 58–89 years) with primary osteoporosis was 41% lower than that of normal premenopausal women and 18% lower than that of age-matched controls. A weak inverse relationship between lumbar bone mineral content and the number of compression fractures was found. A weak inverse relationship between lumbar bone mineral content and the number of compression fractures was found. 6. Women with lumbar bone mineral content values below the 95% confidence limits for normal premenopausal women are at risk of future vertebral compression fractures, the fracture risk being inversely related to lumbar bone mineral content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Matkovic, V, Jelic, T., Wardlaw, G. M., Ilich, J. Z., Goel, P. K., Wright, J. K., Andon, M. B., Smith, K. T., & Heaney, R. P. (1994) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci117034 · Cited by 806
Smoking and bone loss among postmenopausal women
Krall, E. A., & Dawson-Hughes, B. (1991) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650060404 · Cited by 256
Faber, Jensen, Petersen, Nygaard, Hegedüs, & Siersbæk‐Nielsen (1998) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2265.1998.00427.x · Cited by 156
The effects of menopause on longitudinal bone loss from the spine
Pouilles, J. M., Tremollieres, F., & Ribot, C. (1993) · Calcified Tissue International · doi:10.1007/bf00310195 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Krølner, B., & Nielsen, S. P.
- Venue
- Clinical Science
- Publisher
- Portland Press Ltd.
- Published
- 1982-03-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 329-336
- ISSN
- 0143-5221 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-8736
- OpenAlex
- W47020179
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.