Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 204

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Lactulose 51Cr-labelled ethylenediaminetetra-acetate, l-rhamnose and polyethyleneglycol 500 as probe markers for assessment in vivo of human intestinal permeability

Maxton, D. G., Bjarnason, I., Reynolds, A. P., Catt, S. D., Peters, T. J., Menzies, I. S.·1986·Clinical Science

Abstract

1. The urinary excretion of lactulose, 51Cr-labelled ethylenediaminetetra-acetate (51Cr-EDTA), l-rhamnose and polyethyleneglycol 400 (PEG-400) has been measured after intravenous and oral administration in healthy volunteers. 2. Intestinal permeation of the probes was compared after their ingestion in iso-osmolar, hyperosmolar and cetrimide-containing test solutions. 3. Urinary recovery of lactulose and 51Cr-EDTA after intravenous administration reached 75% by 5 h, and exceeded 90% at 24 h, and these values were 62 and 72%, respectively, for l-rhamnose. Recovery of PEG-400, however, varied with the relative molecular mass (Mr) of each polymer from 25.9 to 68.5% in 24 h. 4. Intestinal permeation of ingested lactulose and 51Cr-EDTA was low, but that of L-rhamnose was 45-fold, and that of PEG-400 100-fold, greater. Permeation of lactulose and 51Cr-EDTA was markedly increased by cetrimide and hyperosmolar stress, whereas that of l-rhamnose showed little change. PEG-400 permeation was not affected by cetrimide, but was slightly increased by hyperosmolar stress. 5. The 5 h permeation of lactulose, but not of l-rhamnose or PEG-400, correlated with that of 51Cr-EDTA (r = 0.98, P < 0.001). 6. These findings are compatible with three distinct pathways of unmediated mucosal permeation, l-rhamnose (radius < 0.4 nm) passing mainly through small aqueous ‘pores’ of high incidence, lactulose and 51Cr-EDTA (radius > 0.5 nm) through larger aqueous ‘channels' of low incidence susceptible to cetrimide and hyperosmolar stress, and PEG-400, which has appreciable lipid solubility, by partition through cell membrane lipid as well as the aqueous ‘pores’.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1042/cs0710071

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 204

Metadata

Authors
Maxton, D. G., Bjarnason, I., Reynolds, A. P., Catt, S. D., Peters, T. J., & Menzies, I. S.
Venue
Clinical Science
Published
1986-07-01
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
71-80
ISSN
  • 0143-5221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-8736
OpenAlex
W2285643986
Cited by
204
References
0
FWCI
9.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lactulose 51Cr-labelled ethylenediaminetetra-acetate, l-rhamnose and polyethyleneglycol 500 as probe markers for assessment in vivo of human intestinal permeability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1042/cs0710071
The paper
Maxton, D. G., Bjarnason, I., Reynolds, A. P., Catt, S. D., Peters, T. J., & Menzies, I. S. (1986). Lactulose 51Cr-labelled ethylenediaminetetra-acetate, l-rhamnose and polyethyleneglycol 500 as probe markers for assessment in vivo of human intestinal permeability. Clinical Science. https://doi.org/10.1042/cs0710071

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.