The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lactulose 51Cr-labelled ethylenediaminetetra-acetate, l-rhamnose and polyethyleneglycol 500 as probe markers for assessment in vivo of human intestinal permeability
Abstract
1. The urinary excretion of lactulose, 51Cr-labelled ethylenediaminetetra-acetate (51Cr-EDTA), l-rhamnose and polyethyleneglycol 400 (PEG-400) has been measured after intravenous and oral administration in healthy volunteers. 2. Intestinal permeation of the probes was compared after their ingestion in iso-osmolar, hyperosmolar and cetrimide-containing test solutions. 3. Urinary recovery of lactulose and 51Cr-EDTA after intravenous administration reached 75% by 5 h, and exceeded 90% at 24 h, and these values were 62 and 72%, respectively, for l-rhamnose. Recovery of PEG-400, however, varied with the relative molecular mass (Mr) of each polymer from 25.9 to 68.5% in 24 h. 4. Intestinal permeation of ingested lactulose and 51Cr-EDTA was low, but that of L-rhamnose was 45-fold, and that of PEG-400 100-fold, greater. Permeation of lactulose and 51Cr-EDTA was markedly increased by cetrimide and hyperosmolar stress, whereas that of l-rhamnose showed little change. PEG-400 permeation was not affected by cetrimide, but was slightly increased by hyperosmolar stress. 5. The 5 h permeation of lactulose, but not of l-rhamnose or PEG-400, correlated with that of 51Cr-EDTA (r = 0.98, P < 0.001). 6. These findings are compatible with three distinct pathways of unmediated mucosal permeation, l-rhamnose (radius < 0.4 nm) passing mainly through small aqueous ‘pores’ of high incidence, lactulose and 51Cr-EDTA (radius > 0.5 nm) through larger aqueous ‘channels' of low incidence susceptible to cetrimide and hyperosmolar stress, and PEG-400, which has appreciable lipid solubility, by partition through cell membrane lipid as well as the aqueous ‘pores’.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Intestinal permeability: an overview
Bjarnason, I., Macpherson, A., & Hollander, D. (1995) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/0016-5085(95)90708-4 · Cited by 927
Self-citationParlesak, A., Schäfer, C., Schütz, T., Bode, J. C., & Bode, C. (2000) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s0168-8278(00)80242-1 · Cited by 647
Abnormal Intestinal Permeability in Subgroups of Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndromes
Dunlop, S. P., Hebden, J., Campbell, E., Naesdal, J., Olbe, L., Perkins, A. C., & Spiller, R. C. (2006) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00672.x · Cited by 476
The crucial role of metal ions in neurodegeneration: the basis for a promising therapeutic strategy
Gaeta, A., & Hider, R. C. (2005) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0706416 · Cited by 411
Is small intestinal permeability really increased in relatives of patients with Crohn's disease?
May, G. R., Sutherland, L. R., & Meddings, J. B. (1993) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/0016-5085(93)90638-s · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Maxton, D. G., Bjarnason, I., Reynolds, A. P., Catt, S. D., Peters, T. J., & Menzies, I. S.
- Venue
- Clinical Science
- Publisher
- Portland Press Ltd.
- Published
- 1986-07-01
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-80
- ISSN
- 0143-5221 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-8736
- OpenAlex
- W2285643986
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lactulose 51Cr-labelled ethylenediaminetetra-acetate, l-rhamnose and polyethyleneglycol 500 as probe markers for assessment in vivo of human intestinal permeability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1042/cs0710071
- The paper
- Maxton, D. G., Bjarnason, I., Reynolds, A. P., Catt, S. D., Peters, T. J., & Menzies, I. S. (1986). Lactulose 51Cr-labelled ethylenediaminetetra-acetate, l-rhamnose and polyethyleneglycol 500 as probe markers for assessment in vivo of human intestinal permeability. Clinical Science. https://doi.org/10.1042/cs0710071
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.