Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A double-blind randomized multicentre clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two doses of etomoxir in comparison with placebo in patients with moderate congestive heart failure: the ERGO (etomoxir for the recovery of glucose oxidation) study

Open access
Holubarsch, Christian J. F., Rohrbach, Martin, Karrasch, Matthias, Boehm, Erich, Polonski, Lech, Ponikowski, Piotr, Rhein, Siegfried·2007·Clinical Science

Abstract

Etomoxir is an inhibitor of mitochondrial CPT1 (carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1) and thereby switches energy metabolism from fatty acids to glucose oxidation. Such a metabolic change may be beneficial in CHF (congestive heart failure). The ERGO (etomoxir for the recovery of glucose oxidation) study was designed in which etomoxir was tested at a dose of 80 and 40 mg compared with placebo for a period of 6 months in patients with CHF. As the principle measure of efficacy, a maximal exercise tolerance test and a submaximal 6-min corridor walk test were used. Secondary end points were echocardiographical dimensions and quality-of-life assessment scores. A total of 350 patients were planned to be screened, with the expectation that end point data would be available from approx. 260 patients. However, the study had to be stopped prematurely, because unacceptably high liver transaminase levels were detected in four patients taking etomoxir. At the termination of the study, 121 patients were randomized to placebo, 118 to 40 mg of etomoxir and 108 to 80 mg of etomoxir. At that time, 21 patients in the placebo group, 16 in the 40 mg of etomoxir group and 14 patients in the 80 mg of etomoxir group had completed the study. The mean increases in exercise time were 3.3, 10.2 and 19.4 s for the placebo, 40 mg of etomoxir and 80 mg of etomoxir groups respectively (P value was not significant). No changes were obvious in the 6-min corridor walk test or in echocardiographical parameters from baseline. The number of patients that completed the study was too small to demonstrate significant effects on exercise time, although there was a tendency towards an increase in exercise time. Therefore, before rejecting the hypothesis that inhibition of fatty acid oxidation might be beneficial in CHF, similar studies have to be performed using different inhibitors of fatty acid oxidation targeting CPT1 and other enzymes in this metabolic pathway.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1042/cs20060307

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
Holubarsch, C. J. F., Rohrbach, M., Karrasch, M., Boehm, E., Polonski, L., Ponikowski, P., & Rhein, S.
Venue
Clinical Science
Published
2007-07-13
Volume
113
Issue
4
Pages
205-212
ISSN
  • 0143-5221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-8736
OpenAlex
W2012740748
Cited by
287
References
8
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A double-blind randomized multicentre clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two doses of etomoxir in comparison with placebo in patients with moderate congestive heart failure: the ERGO (etomoxir for the recovery of glucose oxidation) study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1042/cs20060307
The paper
Holubarsch, C. J. F., Rohrbach, M., Karrasch, M., Boehm, E., Polonski, L., Ponikowski, P., & Rhein, S. (2007). A double-blind randomized multicentre clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two doses of etomoxir in comparison with placebo in patients with moderate congestive heart failure: the ERGO (etomoxir for the recovery of glucose oxidation) study. Clinical Science. https://doi.org/10.1042/cs20060307

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.