The Inference of Speech Perception in the Phonologically Disordered Child. Part II: Some Clinically Novel Procedures, Their Use, Some Findings
Abstract
Several procedures used to assess speech perception of children with disorders at the phonological level of language are described. In most cases of segmental substitution, children discriminated target and substitution phonemes regardless of whether both were spoken by an adult, or one form was produced by an adult and the other was the child's internal representation of the target phoneme. However, in about a third of the cases there was consistent failure to discriminate the target phoneme from the substituted phoneme. Perceptual approaches to the treatment of sound production problems are questioned when perception is inferably differential. Certain phonetic effects, and their implications for theories of phonological acquisition and disorder, are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Speech Perception-Production Task was used to assess the children's perception of the phonological contrast they had difficulties producing.
“To assess the children's perception of the phonological contrast they had difficulties producing, the Speech Perception‐Production Task (SP‐PT, Locke 1980) was used.”
From Self‐Supervised App‐Based Speech Training for Children With Speech Sound Disorder—A Single‐Case Experimental Design Study (2026) · cites this paper as Locke 1980
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 100
- Authors
- Locke, J. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Locke, John L.
- ORCID
- Locke, John L.
- Venue
- Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders
- Published
- 1980-11
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 445-468
- ISSN
- 0022-4677 (ISSN-L)
- 2163-6184
- OpenAlex
- W3024853894
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- speech perception, phonological disorders, children, phoneme discrimination, phonological development
- MeSH terms
- Child, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Phonetics, Speech Discrimination Tests, Speech Disorders, Speech Production Measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review