The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Patterns of Discourse Cohesion and Coherence in Alzheimer's Disease
Abstract
Patterns of discourse—as reflected in the use of propositions, cohesion devices, and in judgments of coherence—in the speech of 6 well elderly and 6 patients with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type (SDAT) during topic-centered interviews were compared. Compared to the well elderly, SDAT patients used significantly more words and conversational turns. The interviewer also used more words and turns when interviewing SDAT patients, making those interviews more lengthy and more interactive than those of the elderly comparison group. Although significant differences in propositional form and cohesion devices were not found, a pattern of cohesion disruptions in SDAT patients was identified that appears consistent with previously noted patterns of language dissolution. Coherence judgments by four listeners showed significant differences between the two groups. The breakdowns in coherence were related to one subtype of cohesion disruption, missing element. This suggests that incoherence may result in part from a loss of the ability to take the listener's perspective in developing thematic structure during conversation. It is argued that SDAT results not only in the impairment of linguistic abilities but also in the impairment of discourse abilities that contribute to Alzheimer patients' incoherent speech.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Connected Speech in Neurodegenerative Language Disorders: A Review
Boschi, V., Catricalà, E., Consonni, M., Chesi, C., Moro, A., & Cappa, S. F. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00269 · Cited by 362
Connected speech as a marker of disease progression in autopsy-proven Alzheimer’s disease
Ahmed, S., Haigh, A.-M. F., de Jager, C. A., & Garrard, P. (2013) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awt269 · Cited by 362
Mueller, K. D., Hermann, B., Mecollari, J., & Turkstra, L. S. (2018) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803395.2018.1446513 · Cited by 336
AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: A review
Beukelman, D. R., Fager, S., Ball, L., & Dietz, A. (2007) · Augmentative and Alternative Communication · doi:10.1080/07434610701553668 · Cited by 264
Bucks, R. S., Singh, S., Cuerden, J. M., & Wilcock, G. K. (2000) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/026870300401603 · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Ripich, D. N., & Terrell, B. Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders
- Published
- 1988-02
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 8-15
- ISSN
- 0022-4677 (ISSN-L)
- 2163-6184
- OpenAlex
- W2092891720
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns of Discourse Cohesion and Coherence in Alzheimer's Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1044/jshd.5301.08
- The paper
- Ripich, D. N., & Terrell, B. Y. (1988). Patterns of Discourse Cohesion and Coherence in Alzheimer's Disease. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.5301.08
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.