The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Temporal Characteristics of the Speech of Normal Elderly Adults
Abstract
A number of physical and psychological changes occur as a result of the normal aging process. These changes often result in an increase in the time subjects require to perform various motor (and sensory) tasks. Although the effects of aging upon a variety of behaviors have been quite well documented, considerably less information is available concerning how normal aging may affect speech production. The present study examined temporal characteristics of the speech of 10 normal, elderly adults and 10 young adults who produced a variety of words and sentences at both normal and fast speaking rates. Acoustic analyses indicated that the elderly adults' segment, syllable, and sentence durations were 20 to 25% longer than those of the young adults at both the normal and the fast rates of speech. In addition to comparisons that were made between these two groups of subjects, comparisons were also made with durations of the speech of young children studied in previous research. It was observed that the elderly subjects tended to produce durations comparable to those of 6- and 7-year-old children.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Sources of variability commonly found in normal speech including accent or gender, when further compounded with those over age and speech pathology severity, create large diversity among dysarthric and elderly speakers [39], [51].”
From Speaker adaptation using spectro-temporal deep features for dysarthric and elderly speech recognition (2022) · cites this paper as [51]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Geng, M., Xie, X., Ye, Z., Wang, T., Li, G., Hu, S., Liu, X., & Meng, H. (2022) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2022.3195113 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, B. L., Wasowicz, J., & Preston, J.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Published
- 1987-12
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 522-529
- ISSN
- 1092-4388 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9102
- OpenAlex
- W1964198739
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 0.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Northwestern University
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Voice and Speech Disorders
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
- Keywords
- normal aging, speech production, segment duration, syllable duration, sentence duration, speech rate, older adults, speech acoustics
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aging, Female, Humans, Male, Phonetics, Reference Values, Sound Spectrography, Speech, Speech Acoustics, Speech Production Measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
