The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pathologic Voice Type and the Acoustic Prediction of Severity
Abstract
We hypothesized that acoustic measures would predict dysphonic severity with differential results for pathological voice types. An instructional program based upon synthesized voice signals was developed to facilitate an awareness of prototypical voice types. Eighty phonatory samples representing normal subjects as well as patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis, vocal nodules, and functional dysphonia were analyzed acoustically on the basis of four measures: average fundamental frequency (F 0 ), jitter, shimmer, and harmonic/noise ratio (H/N ratio). Following training, 29 listeners classified 62% of the phonatory samples on the basis of breathy, hoarse, rough, and normal. Dysphonic severity of rough voices was predicted more successfully by H/N ratio ( r 2 =.73) than by shimmer ( r 2 =.43). Dysphonic severity of breathy voices was predicted only by the combined features of less jitter, more shimmer, and lower H/N ratio ( r 2 =.74). No combination of acoustic variables was successful in the prediction of the hoarse voice type.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Essentials of Psychological Testing
Urbina, S. (2014) · doi:10.1002/9781394259458 · Cited by 1,845
Cited by
Voice characteristics in the progression of Parkinson's disease
J. Holmes, R., M. Oates, J., J. Phyland, D., & J. Hughes, A. (2000) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.1080/136828200410654 · Cited by 294
Perceptual evaluation of voice quality and its correlation with acoustic measurements
Bhuta, T., Patrick, L., & Garnett, J. D. (2004) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2003.12.004 · Cited by 288
Discrimination of pathological voices using a time-frequency approach
Umapathy, K., Krishnan, S., Parsa, V., & Jamieson, D. G. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2004.842962 · Cited by 149
Multidirectional Regression (MDR)-Based Features for Automatic Voice Disorder Detection
Muhammad, G., Mesallam, T. A., Malki, K. H., Farahat, M., Mahmood, A., & Alsulaiman, M. (2012) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.05.002 · Cited by 66
Jayakumar, T., & Savithri, S. R. (2012) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.05.008 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, D., Fitch, J., & Wolfe, V.
- Venue
- Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 765-771
- ISSN
- 1092-4388 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9102
- OpenAlex
- W2035278284
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pathologic Voice Type and the Acoustic Prediction of Severity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1044/jshr.3804.765
- The paper
- Martin, D., Fitch, J., & Wolfe, V. (1995). Pathologic Voice Type and the Acoustic Prediction of Severity. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3804.765
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.