The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Past-Tense Marking by Children With and Without Specific Language Impairment
Abstract
This study examined the productivity and representation of past-tense marking in children with and without specific language impairment (SLI). Participants were 11 6-year-olds with SLI, 11 age-matched controls, and 11 MLU-matched controls. Regular and irregular verbs were used to examine the productivity of regular marking. Past-tense representation was examined by asking children to inflect homophonous pairs of denominal and irregular root verbs. All three groups demonstrated productive marking of past tense, although as expected the accuracy of the impaired group was less than that of either control group. Patterns of past-tense marking as a function of a word's phonological composition and inflectional frequency were the same for the SLI- and MLU-matched groups, and all children presented a past-tense system that was sensitive to grammatical structure. The findings replicate previous research of the SLI morphological system and provide additional specification of these children's morphological strengths and weaknesses. Strengths include the children's sensitivity to grammatical and phonological characteristics of the lexicon; weaknesses include limited productivity of regular past-tense marking and a greater sensitivity to frequency manipulations as compared to normally developing children. Results are discussed in terms of the nature of the SLI profile. They also are used to evaluate the theoretical model on which the study was based.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model
Ullman, M. T. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008 · Cited by 1,893
Specific Language Impairment is not Specific to Language: the Procedural Deficit Hypothesis
Ullman, M. T., & Pierpont, E. I. (2005) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70276-4 · Cited by 888
Bedore, L. M., & Peña, E. D. (2008) · International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism · doi:10.2167/beb392.0 · Cited by 536
The Acquisition of Morphophonology
MacWhinney, B. (1978) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/1166047 · Cited by 502
Syntax and morphology in Williams syndrome
Clahsen, H. (1998) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00049-3 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Oetting, J. B., & Horohov, J. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 62-74
- ISSN
- 1092-4388 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9102
- OpenAlex
- W2000361683
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Past-Tense Marking by Children With and Without Specific Language Impairment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1044/jslhr.4001.62
- The paper
- Oetting, J. B., & Horohov, J. E. (1997). Past-Tense Marking by Children With and Without Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4001.62
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.