The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
Abstract
Background: Knowledge of prognostic factors following resection of rectal cancer may be used in the selection of patients for adjuvant therapy. This study examined the prognostic impact of the circumferential resection margin on local recurrence, distant metastasis and survival rates. Methods: A national population-based rectal cancer registry included all 3319 new patients from November 1993 to August 1997. Some 686 patients underwent total mesorectal excision with a known circumferential margin. This shortest radial resection margin was measured in fixed specimens. None of the patients had adjuvant radiotherapy. Results: Following potentially curative resection and after a median follow-up of 29 (range 14–60) months, the overall local recurrence rate was 7 per cent (46 of 686 patients): 22 per cent among patients with a positive resection margin and 5 per cent in those with a negative margin (margin greater than 1 mm). Forty per cent of patients with a positive margin developed distant metastasis, compared with 12 per cent of those with a negative margin. With decreasing circumferential margin there was an exponential increase in the rates of local recurrence, metastasis and death. Conclusion: The circumferential margin has a significant and major prognostic impact on the rates of local recurrence, distant metastasis and survival. Information on circumferential margin is important in the selection of patients for postoperative adjuvant therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An MRI deep learning model predicts outcome in rectal cancer
Jiang, X., Zhao, H., Saldanha, O. L., Nebelung, S., Kuhl, C., Amygdalos, I., Lang, S. A., Wu, X., Meng, X., Truhn, D., et al. (2023) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.222223 · Cited by 127
Alternative clinical end points in rectal cancer—are we getting closer?
Glynne-Jones, R., Mawdsley, S., Pearce, T., & Buyse, M. (2006) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl173 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Wibe, A., Rendedal, P. R., Svensson, E., Norstein, J., Eide, T. J., Myrvold, H. E., & Søreide, O.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 327-334
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2043126937
- Cited by
- 672
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.02024.x
- The paper
- Wibe, A., Rendedal, P. R., Svensson, E., Norstein, J., Eide, T. J., Myrvold, H. E., & Søreide, O. (2002). Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. British Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.02024.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.