The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antimicrobial dendrimeric peptides
Open accessAbstract
Dendrimeric peptides selective for microbial surfaces have been developed to achieve broad antimicrobial activity and low hemolytic activity to human erythrocytes. The dendrimeric core is an asymmetric lysine branching tethered with two to eight copies of a tetrapeptide (R4) or an octapeptide (R8). The R4 tetrapeptide (RLYR) contains a putative microbial surface recognition BHHB motif (B = basic, H = hydrophobic amino acid) found in protegrins and tachyplesins whereas the octapeptide R8 (RLYRKVYG) consists of an R4 and a degenerated R4 repeat. Antimicrobial assays against 10 organisms in high‐ and low‐salt conditions showed that the R4 and R8 monomers as well as their divalent dendrimers contain no to low activity. In contrast, the tetra‐ and octavalent R4 and R8 dendrimers are broadly active under either conditions, exhibiting relatively similar potency with minimal inhibition concentrations < 1 µ m against both bacteria and fungi. Based on their size and charge similarities, the potency and activity spectrum of the tetravalent R4 dendrimer are comparable to protegrins and tachyplesins, a family of potent antimicrobials containing 17–19 residues. Compared with a series of linearly repeating R4 peptides, the R4 dendrimers show comparable antimicrobial potency, but are more aqueous soluble, more stable to proteolysis, less toxic to human cells and more easily synthesized chemically. These results suggest repeating peptides that cluster the charge and hydrophobic residues may represent a primitive form of microbial pattern‐recognition. Incorporating such knowledge in a dendrimeric design therefore presents an attractive approach for developing novel peptide antibiotics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tam, J. P. (1988) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.85.15.5409 · Cited by 1,251
Self-citation
Cited by
Polymeric materials with antimicrobial activity
Muñoz-Bonilla, A., & Fernández-García, M. (2012) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.08.005 · Cited by 1,221
Spampinato, C., & Leonardi, D. (2013) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2013/204237 · Cited by 411
Application of Light Scattering Techniques to Nanoparticle Characterization and Development
Carvalho, P. M., Felício, M. R., Santos, N. C., Gonçalves, S., & Domingues, M. M. (2018) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2018.00237 · Cited by 402
Ong, Z. Y., Wiradharma, N., & Yang, Y. Y. (2014) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2014.10.013 · Cited by 313
Antimicrobial peptides: promising compounds against pathogenic microorganisms
Cruz, J., Ortiz, C., Guzmán, F., Fernández-Lafuente, R., & Torres, R. (2014) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0929867321666140217110155 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Tam, J. P., Lu, Y., & Yang, J.
- Venue
- European Journal of Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 269
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 923-932
- ISSN
- 0014-2956 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1033
- OpenAlex
- W1547998655
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial dendrimeric peptides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.0014-2956.2001.02728.x
- The paper
- Tam, J. P., Lu, Y., & Yang, J. (2002). Antimicrobial dendrimeric peptides. European Journal of Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0014-2956.2001.02728.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.