The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Habitat associations of trees and shrubs in a 50-ha neotropical forest plot
Abstract
1 Tests of habitat association among species of tropical trees and shrubs often assume that individual stems can be treated as independent sample units, even though limited dispersal conflicts with this assumption by causing new recruits to occur near maternal parents and siblings. 2 We developed methods for assessing patterns of association between mapped plants and mapped habitat types that explicitly incorporate spatial structure, thereby eliminating the need to assume independence among stems. 3 We used these methods to determine habitat-association patterns for 171 species of trees and shrubs within the permanent 50-ha Forest Dynamics Project plot on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. 4 Many fewer significant habitat associations result from the new methods than from traditional, but inappropriate, chi-square tests. The low-lying plateau, the most extensive habitat on the 50-ha plot, had nine species positively associated with it and 19 species negatively associated, leaving 143 species whose distributions were not biased with respect to this habitat. A small swamp in the plot was the most distinct habitat, with 32 species positively and 20 species negatively associated, leaving more than two-thirds of the species neither positively nor negatively associated. 5 To the extent that habitat association reflects habitat specialization, our results suggest that local habitat specialization plays a limited role in the maintenance of species diversity in this forest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hutchinson, G. E. (1957) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1957.022.01.039 · Cited by 6,228
Cited by
Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence
HUBBELL, S. P. (2005) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.0269-8463.2005.00965.x · Cited by 895
Self-citationPlant DNA barcodes and a community phylogeny of a tropical forest dynamics plot in Panama
Kress, W. J., Erickson, D. L., Jones, F. A., Swenson, N. G., Perez, R., Sanjur, O., & Bermingham, E. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0909820106 · Cited by 722
NEUTRAL THEORY AND THE EVOLUTION OF ECOLOGICAL EQUIVALENCE
Hubbell, S. P. (2006) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1387:ntateo]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 594
Self-citationSeed Dispersal and Spatial Pattern in Tropical Trees
Seidler, T. G., & Plotkin, J. B. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040344 · Cited by 532
THE PHYLOGENETIC STRUCTURE OF A NEOTROPICAL FOREST TREE COMMUNITY
Kembel, S. W., & Hubbell, S. P. (2006) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[86:tpsoan]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 420
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Harms, K. E., Condit, R., Hubbell, S. P., & Foster, R. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 947-959
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W2138639791
- Cited by
- 868
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Habitat associations of trees and shrubs in a 50-ha neotropical forest plot. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.0022-0477.2001.00615.x
- The paper
- Harms, K. E., Condit, R., Hubbell, S. P., & Foster, R. B. (2001). Habitat associations of trees and shrubs in a 50-ha neotropical forest plot. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0022-0477.2001.00615.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.