The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Signals in abscission
Abstract
Summary: Abscission is the term used to describe the process of natural separation of organs from the parent plant. This may be part of the highly programmed development of a plant, or in response to environmental stress. It enables temperate plants to overwinter and hence survive, but in agricultural or horticultural environments premature abscission can lead to significant crop losses. Abscission is the culmination of changes in gene expression, which result in the loosening of adjacent cell walls within the zone and subsequent cell separation. For many years it has been recognized that the balance between the plant hormones ethylene and auxin determine where, and when, separation takes place. As we begin to understand the mechanisms by which plant growth regulator signals are perceived and transduced, we can begin to understand how the process of abscission itself may be induced and regulated. This review details what we know of the signals that lead to the differentiation of zone cells; the environmental signals that promote cell separation, and the possible intracellular signalling events that culminate in organ shedding. Contents Summary 323 I. Introduction 323 II. Differentiation of the abscission zone 324 III. Environmental and developmental signals that induce abscission 327 1. Senescence 327 2. Photoperiod 327 3. Water stress 328 4. Wounding and pathogen attack 328 5. Ozone 329 IV. Inter‐ and intracellular signals 329 1. Role of ethylene and auxin 330 2. Mechanisms of plant hormone signal perception 330 3. Roles of other hormones and components of signal transduction 333 V. Conclusions 335 Acknowledgements 336 References 336
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Abeles, F. B. (1973) · Cited by 2,876
Kieber, J. J., Rothenberg, M., Roman, G., Feldmann, K. A., & Ecker, J. R. (1993) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90119-b · Cited by 1,923
Arabidopsis Ethylene-Response Gene ETR1 : Similarity of Product to Two-Component Regulators
Chang, C., Kwok, S. F., Bleecker, A. B., & Meyerowitz, E. M. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8211181 · Cited by 1,521
Effects of Water Deficits on Carbon Assimilation
CHAVES, M. M. (1991) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/42.1.1 · Cited by 1,113
Chao, Q., Rothenberg, M., Solano, R., Roman, G., Terzaghi, W., & Ecker, J. R. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80300-1 · Cited by 1,043
ARF1, a Transcription Factor That Binds to Auxin Response Elements
Ulmasov, T., Hagen, G., & Guilfoyle, T. J. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5320.1865 · Cited by 973
SHATTERPROOF MADS-box genes control seed dispersal in Arabidopsis
Liljegren, S. J., Ditta, G. S., Eshed, Y., Savidge, B., Bowman, J. L., & Yanofsky, M. F. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35008089 · Cited by 957
Sharrock, R. A., & Quail, P. H. (1989) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.3.11.1745 · Cited by 838
(1998) · Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1515/bchm.1998.379.6.633 · Cited by 824
Abel, S., & Theologis, A. (1996) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.111.1.9 · Cited by 762
Cited by
Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses
MILLER, G., SUZUKI, N., CIFTCI‐YILMAZ, S., & MITTLER, R. (2010) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02041.x · Cited by 3,945
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, J. E., & Whitelaw, C. A.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 323-340
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2091999003
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 78
- FWCI
- 5.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Signals in abscission. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.0028-646x.2001.00194.x
- The paper
- Taylor, J. E., & Whitelaw, C. A. (2001). Signals in abscission. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0028-646x.2001.00194.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.