Cited by 523Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsMethodologies in Health Research and Practice

Rigour and grounded theory research

Chiovitti, Rosalina F., Piran, Niva·2003·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Background Grounded theory methodology is a suitable qualitative research approach for clinical inquiry into nursing practice, leading to theory development in nursing. Given the variations in, and subjectivity attached to, the manner in which qualitative research is carried out, it is important for researchers to explain the process of how a theory about a nursing phenomenon was generated. Similarly, when grounded theory research reports are reviewed for clinical use, nurses need to look for researchers' explanations of their inquiry process. Aim The focus of this article is to discuss the practical application of grounded theory procedures as they relate to rigour. Method Reflecting on examples from a grounded theory research study, we suggest eight methods of research practice to delineate further Beck's schema for ensuring, credibility, auditability and fittingness, which are all components of rigour. Findings The eight methods of research practice used to enhance rigour in the course of conducting a grounded theory research study were: (1) let participants guide the inquiry process; (2) check the theoretical construction generated against participants' meanings of the phenomenon; (3) use participants' actual words in the theory; (4) articulate the researcher's personal views and insights about the phenomenon explored; (5) specify the criteria built into the researcher's thinking; (6) specify how and why participants in the study were selected; (7) delineate the scope of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.0309-2402.2003.02822.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 54 · Cited by 523

Authors
Chiovitti, R. F., & Piran, N.
Affiliations
York University (CA)
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-11
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
427-435
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2109477435
Cited by
523
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 35
FWCI
23.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
Keywords
grounded theory, scientific rigor, nursing theory development, credibility, auditability, fittingness, qualitative research methodology
MeSH terms
Humans, Nursing Theory, Research Design, Reproducibility of Results, Nursing Methodology Research, Models, Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review