CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 173Migraine and Headache StudiesTemporomandibular Joint DisordersMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire: Translation and Reliability of the Italian Version

D'Amico, D, Mosconi, P, Genco, S, Usai, S, Prudenzano, AMP, Grazzi, L, Leone, M, Puca, FM, Bussone, G·2001·Cephalalgia
DOI 10.1046/j.0333-1024.2001.00277.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We have developed and tested an Italian version of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire, an established instrument for assessing headache-related disability. A multistep process was used to translate and adapt the questionnaire into Italian, which was then tested on 109 Italian migraine without aura patients, 86 (78.9%) of whom completed the form a second time 21 days later. Overall MIDAS score had good test–retest reliability (Spearman's correlation 0.77), closely similar to that found in English-speaking migraineurs, and individual responses were also satisfactorily reliable. Internal consistency was good (Cronbach's alpha 0.7). These findings support the use of the MIDAS questionnaire as a clinical and research tool with Italian patients.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.0333-1024.2001.00277.x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Smith R, 1996, Headache, 36, 278
  2. Stewart WF, 1994, Neurology, 44, 24
  3. 12 National Academy of Sciences/Institute of Medicine (NAS/IOM). Disability in America: toward a national agenda for prevention. Washington, DC: NAS Press, 1991.
  4. Ware JE, 2000, Cephalalgia, 20, 308
  5. Lipton RB, 2000, Rev Contemp Pharmacother, 11, 63

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 173

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
D'Amico, D., Mosconi, P., Genco, S., Usai, S., Prudenzano, A., Grazzi, L., Leone, M., Puca, F., & Bussone, G.
Affiliations
  • Neurological Institute Carlo Besta, Milano
  • Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research (IT)
  • University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
  • Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (IT)
  • Neurology Clinic, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
Corresponding author
Bussone, G
ORCID
Venue
Cephalalgia
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2001-12
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
947-952
ISSN
  • 0333-1024 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2982
DOI
10.1046/j.0333-1024.2001.00277.x
OpenAlex
W2133465674
Cited by
173
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Cephalalgia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
migraine without aura, headache-related disability, Italian translation, cross-cultural adaptation, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, questionnaire validation
MeSH terms
Adult, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Migraine Disorders, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review