The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ultrasound in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the use of ultrasound in the quantification of prolapse and compare findings with clinical assessments obtained in a blind study. Methods: In a prospective comparative clinical study, 145 patients referred for urogynecological assessment were examined clinically by one operator and by translabial ultrasound by another operator. Results: Clinical staging and International Continence Society coordinates were obtained for all 145 patients, as were ultrasound coordinates for descent of the anterior and posterior vaginal walls. Eighteen percent of the uteri of those women who had not had a hysterectomy in the past could not be seen; none of these women suffered from uterine prolapse clinically. Correlation with the prolapse assessment system recently endorsed by the International Continence Society was good (r = 0.77 for uterine prolapse, r = 0.72 for anterior vaginal wall and r = 0.53 for posterior vaginal wall descent). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that translabial ultrasound can be used to quantify female pelvic organ prolapse. Correlation with the International Continence Society prolapse assessment system is good. The method may be particularly suitable for objective outcome assessment after surgical intervention. Copyright © 2001 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hall, A. F., Theofrastous, J. P., Cundiff, G. W., Harris, R. L., Hamilton, L. F., Swift, S. E., & Bump, R. C. (1996) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70091-1 · Cited by 349
Cited by
Broekhuis, S. R., Kluivers, K. B., Hendriks, J. C. M., Fütterer, J. J., Barentsz, J. O., & Vierhout, M. E. (2009) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-009-0821-1 · Cited by 66
Cystocele recurrence after anterior colporrhaphy with and without mesh use
Wong, V., Shek, K. L., Goh, J., Krause, H., Martin, A., & Dietz, H. P. (2014) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.11.001 · Cited by 52
Self-citationClinical guideline for female lower urinary tract symptoms
TAKAHASHI, S., TAKEI, M., NISHIZAWA, O., YAMAGUCHI, O., KATO, K., GOTOH, M., YOSHIMURA, Y., TAKEYAMA, M., OZAWA, H., SHIMADA, M., et al. (2016) · LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms · doi:10.1111/luts.12111 · Cited by 47
Pelvic organ prolapse and uterine preservation: a cohort study (POP-UP study)
Gagyor, D., Kalis, V., Smazinka, M., Rusavy, Z., Pilka, R., & Ismail, K. M. (2021) · BMC Women's Health · doi:10.1186/s12905-021-01208-5 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Dietz, H. P., Haylen, B. T., & Broome, J.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 511-514
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0705
- OpenAlex
- W2154071423
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrasound in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00494.x
- The paper
- Dietz, H. P., Haylen, B. T., & Broome, J. (2001). Ultrasound in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00494.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.