Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 498

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: a longitudinal study

Open access
Hecher, K., Bilardo, C. M., Stigter, R. H., Ville, Y., Hackelöer, B. J., Kok, H. J., Senat, M. V., Visser, G. H. A.·2001·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objective: To describe the time sequence of changes in fetal monitoring variables in intrauterine growth restriction and to correlate these findings with fetal outcome at delivery. Methods: This was a prospective longitudinal observational multicenter study on 110 singleton pregnancies with growth‐restricted fetuses after 24 weeks of gestation. Short‐term variation of fetal heart rate, pulsatility indices of fetal arterial and venous Doppler waveforms and amniotic fluid index were assessed at each monitoring session. The study population was divided into two groups: Group 1 comprised pregnancies with severely premature fetuses, which were delivered ≤ 32 weeks and Group 2 included pregnancies delivered after 32 completed weeks. Logistic regression was used for modeling the probability for abnormality of a variable in relation to the time interval before delivery. Trends over time were analyzed for all variables by multilevel analysis. Results: Ninety‐three (60 in Group 1 and 33 in Group 2) fetuses had at least three data sets (median, 4; range, 3–27) and had the last measurements taken within 24 h of delivery or intrauterine death. The percentage of abnormal test results and the degree of abnormality were higher in Group 1 compared to Group 2. Amniotic fluid index and umbilical artery pulsatility index were the first variables to become abnormal, followed by the middle cerebral artery, aorta, short‐term variation, ductus venosus and inferior vena cava. In Group 1, short‐term variation and ductus venosus pulsatility index showed mirror images of each other in their trend over time. Perinatal mortality was significantly higher if both variables were abnormal compared to only one or neither being abnormal (13/33 (39%) vs. 4/60 (7%); P = 0.0002; Fisher's exact test). Conclusion: Ductus venosus pulsatility index and short‐term variation of fetal heart rate are important indicators for the optimal timing of delivery before 32 weeks of gestation. Delivery should be considered if one of these parameters becomes persistently abnormal.Copyright © 2001 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00590.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 498

Metadata

Authors
Hecher, K., Bilardo, C. M., Stigter, R. H., Ville, Y., Hackelöer, B. J., Kok, H. J., Senat, M. V., & Visser, G. H. A.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-12
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
564-570
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W1986188027
Cited by
498
References
0
FWCI
23.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: a longitudinal study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00590.x
The paper
Hecher, K., Bilardo, C. M., Stigter, R. H., Ville, Y., Hackelöer, B. J., Kok, H. J., Senat, M. V., & Visser, G. H. A. (2001). Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: a longitudinal study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00590.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.