The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The molecular revolution in ectomycorrhizal ecology: peeking into the black‐box
Open accessAbstract
Molecular tools have now been applied for the past 5 years to dissect ectomycorrhizal (EM) community structure, and they have propelled a resurgence in interest in the field. Results from these studies have revealed that: (i) EM communities are impressively diverse and are patchily distributed at a fine scale below ground; (ii) there is a poor correspondence between fungi that appear dominant as sporocarps vs. those that appear dominant on roots; (iii) members of Russulaceae, Thelephoraceae, and/or non‐thelephoroid resupinates are among the most abundant EM taxa in ecosystems sampled to date; (iv) dissimilar plants are associated with many of the same EM species when their roots intermingle — this occurs on a small enough spatial scale that fungal individuals are likely to be shared by dissimilar plants; and (v) mycoheterotrophic plants have highly specific fungal associations. Although, these results have been impressive, they have been tempered by sampling difficulties and limited by the taxonomic resolution of restriction fragment length polymorphism methods. Minor modifications of the sampling schemes, and more use of direct sequencing, has the potential to solve these problems. Use of additional methods, such as in situ hybridization to ribosomal RNA or hybridization coupled to microarrays, are necessary to open up the analysis of the mycelial component of community structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ihrmark, K., Bödeker, I. T. M., Cruz-Martinez, K., Friberg, H., Kubartova, A., Schenck, J., Strid, Y., Stenlid, J., Brandström-Durling, M., Clemmensen, K. E., et al. (2012) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01437.x · Cited by 2,098
Tedersoo, L., May, T. W., & Smith, M. E. (2010) · Mycorrhiza · doi:10.1007/s00572-009-0274-x · Cited by 1,016
Mycorrhizal networks: Mechanisms, ecology and modelling
Simard, S. W., Beiler, K. J., Bingham, M. A., Deslippe, J. R., Philip, L. J., & Teste, F. P. (2012) · Fungal Biology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.fbr.2012.01.001 · Cited by 593
Fernandez, C. W., & Kennedy, P. G. (2016) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13648 · Cited by 532
Marine Fungi: Their Ecology and Molecular Diversity
Richards, T. A., Jones, M. D. M., Leonard, G., & Bass, D. (2012) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-120710-100802 · Cited by 478
Metadata
- Authors
- Horton, T. R., & Bruns, T. D.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1855-1871
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W1627725260
- Cited by
- 876
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 51.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The molecular revolution in ectomycorrhizal ecology: peeking into the black‐box. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01333.x
- The paper
- Horton, T. R., & Bruns, T. D. (2001). The molecular revolution in ectomycorrhizal ecology: peeking into the black‐box. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01333.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.