The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experience of non‐fatal overdose among heroin users in Adelaide, Australia: circumstances and risk perceptions
Abstract
Abstract Aims. To ascertain the prevalence and risk factors for non‐fatal overdose among heroin users to assist in the development of an effective intervention. Design. Cross‐sectional design. Setting. Community setting, principally metropolitan Adelaide. Participants. Current heroin users (used heroin in the previous six months). Measurements. A structured questionnaire including the Severity of Dependence Scale. Finding. Of 218 current South Australian heroin users interviewed in 1996, 48% had experienced at least one non‐fatal overdose their life‐time (median: two overdoses), and 11% had overdosed in the previous 6 months. At some time, 70% had been present at someone else's overdose (median: three overdoses). At the time of their own most recent overdose, 52% had been using central nervous system depressants in addition to heroin, principally benzodiazepines (33%) and/or alcohol (22%). The majority of overdoses occurred in a private home (81%) and in the presence of other people (88%). Unrealistic optimism regarding the risk of overdose was evident across the sample. Despite almost half the sample reporting having had an overdose, and the belief expressed by respondents that on average about 50% of regular heroin users would overdose during their life‐time 73% had, during the previous 6 months, "rarely" or "never" worried about possibly overdosing. Optimism regarding the possibility of future overdose was reduced in those with recent experience of overdose in comparison to the rest of the sample. A targeted intervention aimed at the reduction of overdose among heroin users is outlined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The epidemiology of benzodiazepine misuse: A systematic review*
Votaw, V. R., Geyer, R., Rieselbach, M. M., & McHugh, R. K. (2019) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.02.033 · Cited by 479
Martins, S. S., Sampson, L., Cerdá, M., & Galea, S. (2015) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2015.302843 · Cited by 333
Coffin, P. O., Galea, S., Ahern, J., Leon, A. C., Vlahov, D., & Tardiff, K. (2003) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00376.x · Cited by 334
Miller, M., Barber, C. W., Leatherman, S., Fonda, J., Hermos, J. A., Cho, K., & Gagnon, D. R. (2015) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.8071 · Cited by 256
Koester, S., Mueller, S. R., Raville, L., Langegger, S., & Binswanger, I. A. (2017) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.06.008 · Cited by 165
Metadata
- Authors
- Mcgregor, C., Darke, S., Ali, R., & Christie, P.
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 701-711
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W1988638436
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experience of non‐fatal overdose among heroin users in Adelaide, Australia: circumstances and risk perceptions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.9357016.x
- The paper
- Mcgregor, C., Darke, S., Ali, R., & Christie, P. (1998). Experience of non‐fatal overdose among heroin users in Adelaide, Australia: circumstances and risk perceptions. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.9357016.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.