Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 206

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Long‐term cannabis use: characteristics of users in an Australian rural area

Reilly, David, Didcott, Peter, Swift, Wendy, Hall, Wayne·1998·Addiction

Abstract

Aim. To investigate the characteristics and patterns of cannabis and other drug use among long‐term cannabis users in an Australian rural area . Design. Cross‐sectional survey of a "snowball" sample of long‐term cannabis users . Setting. The North Coast of New South Wales is an area with high levels of cannabis cultivation and use, and many long‐term users . Participants. The study involved 268 long‐term cannabis users who had regularly used cannabis for at least 10 years . Measurements. A structured interview schedule obtained information on: demographics, social circumstances, patterns of cannabis and other drug use, contexts of use, perceptions about cannabis and legal involvement. Findings. The mean age of the sample was 36 years and 59% were male. The median length of regular cannabis use was 19 years. Most (94%) used two or more times a week and 60% used daily, with a median of two joints per day. Two‐thirds (67%) used cannabis in social settings and two‐thirds grew cannabis for their own use. The most common reasons for using cannabis were for relaxation or relief of tension (61%) and enjoyment or to feel good (27%). The most commonly reported negative effects were feelings of anxiety, paranoia, or depression (21%), tiredness, lack of motivation and low energy (21%) and effects of smoke on the respiratory system (18%). The majority drank alcohol (79%) and over one‐third were drinking at hazardous levels. Most were current (64%) or ex‐tobacco smokers (24%). One‐quarter (25%) had been charged with possession of cannabis, 11% for cultivation and 6% for supply, with non‐drug offences low (8% or less). Overall, three‐quarters (72%) believed that the benefits of cannabis use outweighed the risks, 21% felt there was an even balance, and 7% said cannabis had done them more harm than good. Conclusions. Among long‐term cannabis users in this Australian rural area, cannabis use was an integral part of everyday life and it was primarily used in social situations for the same reasons that alcohol use is used in the wider community.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.9368375.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 206

Metadata

Authors
Reilly, D., Didcott, P., Swift, W., & Hall, W.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-06
Volume
93
Issue
6
Pages
837-846
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2090949493
Cited by
206
References
0
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long‐term cannabis use: characteristics of users in an Australian rural area. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.9368375.x
The paper
Reilly, D., Didcott, P., Swift, W., & Hall, W. (1998). Long‐term cannabis use: characteristics of users in an Australian rural area. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.9368375.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.