Cited by 98Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Therapist/patient race and sex matching: treatment retention and 9-month follow-up outcome

Abstract

AIMS: The current study was conducted to (a) replicate previous findings regarding the effect of patient/therapist race and sex-matching as this relates to the early dropout rate of substance abusers, and (b) to extend previous work by examining the impact of such matching on treatment retention and 9-month outcome. DESIGN: Patient and therapist characteristics were crossed in a 2 x 2 factorial design. Matching effects were then tested using retrospective data. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 967 African-American cocaine-dependent people. SETTING: The study site was a university sponsored outpatient treatment facility located in an economically depressed section of a large Northeastern US city. MEASUREMENTS: Follow-up data were drawn from the Addiction Severity Index, the Risk for AIDS Behavior Inventory, and a questionnaire measuring post-discharge need for treatment, employment and education. Retention was defined as the number of days inclusive between the last date of service and the date of admission. FINDINGS: No significant differences in early dropout rates were found after initial contact with 10 different therapists. Matching therapist and patients with respect to gender and race did not decrease the premature dropout rate, but partial support for gender matching was noted. CONCLUSION: Matching therapist and substance abusing patients on gender and race may not be essential to improving retention and outcome.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.93710439.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 98

Metadata

Authors
Sterling, R. C., Gottheil, E., Weinstein, S. P., & Serota, R.
Affiliations
Thomas Jefferson University (US)
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-07
Volume
93
Issue
7
Pages
1043-1050
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2020670706
Cited by
98
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r18da006166-05)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (1R18 DA 06166)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
gender matching, treatment retention, treatment discontinuation, cocaine dependence, African American patients, addiction treatment, replication, follow-up outcomes, HIV risk behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Dropouts, Professional-Patient Relations, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors, Matched-Pair Analysis, Cocaine-Related Disorders, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review