Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 311

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A prospective study of mortality among drug misusers during a 4‐year period after seeking treatment

Gossop, Michael, Stewart, Duncan, Treacy, Samantha, Marsden, John·2002·Addiction

Abstract

Aims The opportunity to study deaths as they occur within the framework of a prospective cohort study is relatively uncommon. This study investigates deaths among drug misusers over a 4‐year period, with specific attention to the circumstances and causes of death, and risk factors for mortality. The study also critically examines the recording of drug‐related deaths. Design, Setting, Participants Prospective cohort study of 1075 drug misusers recruited to 54 treatment programmes during 1995. Measurements Data derived from interviews conducted with clients at intake, death certificates and post‐mortem examinations. Findings The annual mortality rate was 1.2%, about six times higher than that for a general, age‐matched population. Fourteen per cent of the deaths were due to self‐inflicted injuries, accidents or violence and 18% were due to medical causes. The majority of deaths (68%) were associated with drug overdoses. Opiates were the drugs most commonly detected during post‐mortem examinations. In the majority of cases, more than one drug was detected. Polydrug use and, specifically, heavy drinking, and use of benzodiazepines and amphetamines, were identified as risk factors for mortality. Anxiety and homelessness were also predictive of increased mortality. Conclusions We suggest that drug misusers and those working with drug misusers need to be more alert to the risks of polydrug use, including the combined use of alcohol with illicit drugs. The study revealed inconsistencies in the recording of drug‐related deaths on death certificates. The routine recording of all substances detected during toxicological examination would improve the accuracy of death certification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00079.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 311

Metadata

Authors
Gossop, M., Stewart, D., Treacy, S., & Marsden, J.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-01
Volume
97
Issue
1
Pages
39-47
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2152480297
Cited by
311
References
2
FWCI
11.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A prospective study of mortality among drug misusers during a 4‐year period after seeking treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00079.x
The paper
Gossop, M., Stewart, D., Treacy, S., & Marsden, J. (2002). A prospective study of mortality among drug misusers during a 4‐year period after seeking treatment. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00079.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.