Cited by 199Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Sex differences in the effects of stressful life events on changes in smoking status

McKee, Sherry A., Maciejewski, Paul K., Falba, Tracy, Mazure, Carolyn M.·2003·Addiction

Abstract

Aims Stressful life events known to be associated with substance use were examined to determine if there were sex-specific responses to stress resulting in changes in smoking status. Participants and measurements A community-based sample of ever smokers from the Americans' Changing Lives study (n = 1512, 45% female based on sample weights) was used to examine the interactive effects of sex and stressful life events on the likelihood of two outcomes; relapse among former smokers and failure to quit among current smokers. Logistic regression procedures were used to calculate odds ratios. Factors known to be associated with smoking status (e.g. depression, self-esteem, social support) were assessed as control variables. Findings In the sample of former smokers (n = 729) interpersonal loss events were associated with continued abstinence, whereas change of residence and adverse financial events were associated with increased occurrence of relapse. Women were more likely than men to relapse in response to a financial event. In the sample of current smokers (n = 783), financial events were associated with continued smoking, whereas health events were associated with increased likelihood of quitting. Women were more likely than men to continue smoking in the presence of an adverse financial event and less likely than men to quit in response to an adverse health event. Conclusions Overall, stressful life events appear to have a greater deleterious effect on continued abstinence and t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00408.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 45 · Cited by 199

Authors
McKee, S. A., Maciejewski, P. K., Falba, T., & Mazure, C. M.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
McKee, Sherry A.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-05-22
Volume
98
Issue
6
Pages
847-855
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2155708050
Cited by
199
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (P50DA013334)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
life events, sex differences, smoking status, smoking relapse, smoking cessation, former smokers, current smokers, financial stress, health events, interpersonal loss, tobacco use, women
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Smoking, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress, Psychological, Logistic Models, Smoking Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review