Per capita alcohol consumption and ischaemic heart disease mortality
Abstract
Aim. To test the hypothesis that alcohol consumption is inversely related to ischaemic heart disease (IHD) mortality at the population level. Most individual‐level studies find a reduced risk of IHD with a moderate level of alcohol consumption, but it is as yet unknown whether this association also exists at the aggregate level. Measurements. The study period was approximately 1950 to 1995; 14 EU countries and Norway were included. Time series analyses on differenced data were utilized, and age‐standardized IHD mortality for men and women in the age groups 30‐44, 45‐59, 60‐74 and 30‐74 years was measured. The effects of alcohol (sales per capita) were controlled for a weighted lag of per capita sales of cigarettes. Findings. There was a random distribution of insignificant negative and positive alcohol effect estimates. A slight indication of a cardioprotective effect of alcohol among 30‐ to 44‐year‐old women in high consumption countries could be observed (significant for Italy). Mean alcohol effect estimates were nearly exactly zero (absent alcohol effect) among men and weakly positive among women. Because changes in cigarette consumption were often significantly and positively related to subsequent changes in IHD mortality, poor validity in the IHD time series cannot explain the unsystematic findings. Including a 6‐year weighted lag of alcohol consumption changed the weak positive effect among women to an absent alcohol effect. A brief analysis of abstinence rates indicated no particular relationship to IHD mortality. Conclusion. The alleged cardioprotective alcohol effect is absent at the population level, and great caution should be taken concerning alcohol policies for cardioprotective purposes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
While such a hypothesis is based on individual-level studies, it could not always be confirmed in ecological analyses such as time-series analyses.
“While such a hypothesis is based on individual‐level studies, it could not always be confirmed in ecological analyses such as time–series analyses (for confirmation see 5, 324; for essentially no relations in a number of countries in the European Union, see 325; for a result contrary to the hypothesis, see 326).”
From The relationship between different dimensions of alcohol use and the burden of disease—an update (2017) · cites this paper as [325]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 57
- Authors
- Hemström, Ö.
- Affiliations
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Hemström, Örjan
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 1s1
- Pages
- 93-112
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W2143862099
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Addiction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Systembolaget
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
- Keywords
- alcohol consumption, ischemic heart disease mortality, cigarette consumption, abstinence rates, alcohol policy, sex differences, time series analysis, European countries
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Europe, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk, Poisson Distribution, Myocardial Ischemia, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review