Cited by 140Sports Performance and TrainingSports Dynamics and BiomechanicsSports injuries and prevention

Specificity of training velocity and training load on gains in isokinetic knee joint strength

AAGAARD, P., SIMONSEN, E. B., TROLLE, M., BANGSBO, J., KLAUSEN, K.·1996·Acta Physiologica Scandinavica

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of three different strength training regimes on the isokinetic strength profile of the knee extensors (quadriceps, Q) and flexors (hamstrings, H) and if increases in isokinetic strength were accompanied by an enhanced performance during a more complex leg movement, the soccer kick. Twenty‐two elite soccer players performed 12 weeks of strength training (three times per week) at either high resistance (HR group: 4 sets, 8 reps, 8RM loading), low resistance (LR group: 4 sets, 24 reps, 24RM loading), loaded kicking movements (LK group: 4 sets, 16 reps, 16RM loading) while one group served as controls (CO group). Isokinetic concentric and eccentric moment of force was obtained (KinCom) as peak moment (M peak ) and moment at 50° knee flexion (M 50 ) at angular velocities of 30, 120, 240° s ‐1 . Isokinetic knee joint strength was unchanged in groups LR, LK, CO. However, after the HR strength training, concentric M peak (±SD) increased ( P <0.01) at 30° s ‐1 (Q, 258±37 to 297±57 Nm; H, 122±22 to 140±21 Nm). Furthermore, eccentric M peak increased at 30, 120 and 240° s ‐1 (Q, 274±60 to 345±57 Nm ( P <0.01), 291±56 to 309±49 Nm and 275±43 to 293±36 Nm ( P <0.05), respectively; H, 143±32 to 158±25 Nm, 152±39 to 169±31 Nm and 148±27 to 163±19 Nm ( P <0.05)). Corresponding increases ( P <0.05) were observed for M 50 . The H/Q ratio calculated as eccentric hamstring strength divided by concentric quadriceps strength (H ecc /Q con , representative for knee extension) at 240° s ‐1 increased ( P <0.05) from 107 to 118% (based on M peak ) and from 90 to 105% (M 50 ). Kicking performance estimated by maximal ball flight velocity was unaffected by any of the strength training regimes investigated. In conclusion, only heavy‐resistance strength training induced increases in isokinetic muscle strength in the absence of learning effects. Concentric strength gains were observed at the actual velocity of training, while eccentric strength gains were found over the entire range of velocities examined. The capacity of the hamstring muscles for providing stability to the knee joint during fast extension was augmented as a result of the heavy‐resistance strength training. Strength training should be integrated with other types of training involving the actual movement pattern in order to increase the performance within more complex movement patterns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-201x.1996.438162000.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Findings on isokinetic strength are conflicting; some studies show a benefit of heavy load training, others show a benefit to low-load training, and yet others show no differences between conditions.

    “the findings from available evidence are conflicting; some studies show a benefit of heavy load training [27,28], others show a benefit to low-load training [29] and yet others show no differences between conditions on this metric [30,31].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
AAGAARD, P., SIMONSEN, E. B., TROLLE, M., BANGSBO, J., & KLAUSEN, K.
Affiliations
  • Rigshospitalet (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
AAGAARD, P.
Venue
Acta Physiologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-02
Volume
156
Issue
2
Pages
123-129
ISSN
  • 0001-6772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-201X
OpenAlex
W2023620718
Cited by
140
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Physiologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
Keywords
resistance training, training load, soccer players, knee extensors, knee flexors, eccentric strength, concentric strength, H/Q ratio, elite athletes, muscle strength gain
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Knee Joint, Male, Physical Fitness, Psychomotor Performance, Tendons, Exercise, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review