Cited by 38Anesthesia and Sedative AgentsGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and TreatmentGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Safety and Efficacy of Glucagon as a Premedication for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy—A Comparative Study with Butyl Scopolamine Bromide

Hashimoto, T., Adachi, K., Ishimura, N., Hirakawa, K., Katsube, T., Kurotani, A., Hattori, S., Kinoshita, Y.·2002·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Background Glucagon inhibits digestive motility and is used for endoscopic premedication; however, its effect on cardiopulmonary function during endoscopy has not yet been fully investigated. Aim To clarify the efficacy and safety of glucagon compared with butyl scopolamine bromide as upper gastrointestinal endoscopy premedication. Methods Two hundred and forty consecutive patients over 40 years of age, referred for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, without any complications, were studied. These patients were randomly premedicated with butyl scopolamine bromide (SC group) or glucagon (G group). Time course changes in blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, heart rate and the number of retching episodes during endoscopy were examined. The efficacy of glucose tablets after upper gastrointestinal endoscopy to prevent hypoglycaemia caused by glucagon was evaluated. Cardiopulmonary parameters were also examined in 77 complicated patients with glucagon premedication (GC group). Results A continuous increase in heart rate during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was observed in the SC group, but not in the G and GC groups. Blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation and number of retching episodes were not different between the groups. Hypoglycaemia-related symptoms were frequent in the G group without glucose tablets, but were prevented by the administration of glucose. Conclusions Glucagon has a weaker effect on cardiopulmonary function during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.01148.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hashimoto, T., Adachi, K., Ishimura, N., Hirakawa, K., Katsube, T., Kurotani, A., Hattori, S., & Kinoshita, Y.
Affiliations
Shimane University (JP)
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-01-07
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
111-118
ISSN
  • 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2036
OpenAlex
W2070470040
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
glucagon, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, hypoglycemia, cardiopulmonary function, heart rate, retching, blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Pressure, Butylscopolammonium Bromide, Female, Gastrointestinal Agents, Gastrointestinal Motility, Glucagon, Glucose, Heart Rate, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Male, Oxygen, Parasympatholytics, Prospective Studies, Vomiting, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review