Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 169

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

How patients manage gastrointestinal symptoms after pelvic radiotherapy

Gami, B., Harrington, K., Blake, P., Dearnaley, D., Tait, D., Davies, J., Norman, A. R., Andreyev, H. J. N.·2003·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Summary: Background : Approximately 13 000 patients undergo pelvic radiotherapy annually in the UK. It is not clear how frequently patients develop a permanent change in bowel habit after pelvic radiotherapy that affects their quality of life because the measures of gastrointestinal toxicity used in trials in the past have generally been inadequate. It has been suggested that patients who are symptomatic are only rarely referred to a gastroenterologist and it is not known how patients manage their symptoms. Methods : Patients who had completed radiotherapy for pelvic cancer at least 1 year previously were invited to answer 30 structured questions in a face‐to‐face interview to determine the frequency of gastrointestinal symptoms and what orthodox, dietary and complementary therapies they used to deal with them. They were also asked to score the effectiveness of the measures they had taken. Results : One hundred and seven patients were recruited [35 males; median age, 65 years (range, 35–80 years); 72 females; median age, 67.5 years (range, 31–87 years)]. Eight had been treated for a gastrointestinal primary tumour, 34 for a urological tumour and 65 for gynaecological tumours. Eighty‐seven patients (81%) described new‐onset gastrointestinal problems starting after radiotherapy. These symptoms affected the quality of life in 56 patients (52%). Significant effects on the quality of life were caused by diarrhoea or constipation (n = 53), faecal leakage (n = 19), abdominal, rectal or perineal pain (n = 14) and rectal bleeding (n = 6). Fifty‐nine patients had seen a doctor for their symptoms (86% found this helpful), 12 had seen a dietician or nurse (50% found this helpful) and 14 had seen alternative practitioners (88% found this helpful). Dietary manipulation generally did not improve symptoms, except in a small group of patients (14/15) who avoided raw vegetables to great benefit. Conclusions : At least 1 year after pelvic radiotherapy, gastrointestinal symptoms which have an adverse effect on the quality of life may be more common than generally reported. Patients found that advice from doctors and alternative practitioners was equally valuable. Dietary manipulation was generally unhelpful for gastrointestinal symptoms after pelvic radiotherapy, although the role of eliminating raw vegetables may benefit from further evaluation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01760.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 169

Metadata

Authors
Gami, B., Harrington, K., Blake, P., Dearnaley, D., Tait, D., Davies, J., Norman, A. R., & Andreyev, H. J. N.
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-10-16
Volume
18
Issue
10
Pages
987-994
ISSN
  • 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2036
OpenAlex
W2032965196
Cited by
169
References
0
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How patients manage gastrointestinal symptoms after pelvic radiotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01760.x
The paper
Gami, B., Harrington, K., Blake, P., Dearnaley, D., Tait, D., Davies, J., Norman, A. R., & Andreyev, H. J. N. (2003). How patients manage gastrointestinal symptoms after pelvic radiotherapy. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01760.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.