Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 295

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Symptoms of gastro‐oesophageal reflux: prevalence, severity, duration and associated factors in a Spanish population

Open access
Diaz‐Rubio, M., Moreno‐Elola‐Olaso, C., Rey, E., Locke, G. R., Rodriguez‐Artalejo, F.·2004·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Summary: Aim : To measure the prevalence of gastro‐oesophageal reflux symptoms and to identify associated factors in a representative sample of the Spanish population. Methods : A telephone survey of 2500 subjects was performed using a validated questionnaire. The association of gastro‐oesophageal reflux symptoms (defined as the presence of heartburn or acid regurgitation) and their clinical characteristics with potential risk factors was summarized using the odds ratios (OR) obtained by multiple logistic regression. Results : The response rate was 71.2%. The annual prevalence of gastro‐oesophageal reflux symptoms was 31.6%[95% confidence interval (CI), 29.8–33.4] and the weekly prevalence was 9.8% (95% CI, 8.6–10.9). Gastro‐oesophageal reflux symptoms were associated with excess weight (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.23–1.92), obesity (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.30–2.32), the psychosomatic symptom score (OR, 2.98; 95% CI, 2.41–3.67) and the presence of gastro‐oesophageal reflux symptoms in a direct family member (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.17–2.23). Gastro‐oesophageal reflux symptoms of ≥ 10 years' duration were more frequent in obese subjects (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.14–3.22) and those with a direct family member with gastro‐oesophageal reflux symptoms (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.44–4.06). Factors associated with gastro‐oesophageal reflux symptoms of ≤ 1 year duration were a spouse with gastro‐oesophageal reflux symptoms (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.39–3.9) and the consumption of 1–5 aspirins/week (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.01–2.86). Conclusions : The prevalence of frequent gastro‐oesophageal reflux symptoms in Spain is lower than that observed in other Western populations. The psychosomatic symptom score is the factor most strongly associated with gastro‐oesophageal reflux symptoms. Long‐term gastro‐oesophageal reflux symptoms are associated with certain genetic factors (obesity, family history of gastro‐oesophageal reflux symptoms), whereas short‐term gastro‐oesophageal reflux symptoms are associated with factors of probable environmental nature.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01769.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 295

Metadata

Authors
Diaz‐Rubio, M., Moreno‐Elola‐Olaso, C., Rey, E., Locke, G. R., & Rodriguez‐Artalejo, F.
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-11-27
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
95-105
ISSN
  • 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2036
OpenAlex
W2043231857
Cited by
295
References
2
FWCI
12.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.