Cited by 37Aquaculture Nutrition and GrowthMarine and fisheries researchFish Biology and Ecology Studies

Growth and survival of first-feeding spotted wolffish (Anarhichas minor Olafsen) at various temperature regimes: Effect of temperature on spotted wolffish growth

Open access
Hansen, Tove K, Falk-Petersen, Inger-Britt·2002·Aquaculture Research

Abstract

In order to define temperature regimes that could benefit successful production of spotted wolffish (Anarhichas minor) juveniles, experiments with offspring from two different females were carried out. The larvae were fed a new formulated feed or a commercial start-feed for marine fish, both of which have given high survival rates. In the first experiment newly hatched larvae were fed at constant 6 °C, 8 °C, 10 °C and 12 °C as well as at ambient seawater temperature (2.9–4.5 °C) during 63 days. High survival, 90% to 96%, was registered at ambient and most constant temperature regimes, whereas in the 12 °C groups survival was reduced to 80%. Growth rate (SGR) was very low, 1.8% day−1, at the low ambient temperatures. Growth rate was positively correlated with temperature and varied between 3.1% day−1 to 4.7% day−1, from 6 °C to 12 °C. In the second experiment, set up to include potential detrimental temperatures and study beneficial effects of a more restricted, elevated first-feeding temperature regime, the larvae were fed at constant 8 °C, 10 °C, 12 °C, 14 °C and 16 °C until 30 days post hatch, followed by constant 8 °C for the next 33 days. In this experiment, low survival, 25% and 2.0%, was registered at 63 days post hatch when larvae were reared initially at 14 °C and 16 °C respectively. The survival of the larvae at the other temperature regimes varied from 47% to 64%, highest survival rate (64%) was found at 8 °C. The lowest specific growth rate, 2.6% day−1, was noted in the 16 °C group. At constant 8 °C to 14 °C (regulated to 8 °C), the SGR varied from 4.45% day−1 to 5.13% day−1. The larvae grew faster in the experiment when initially comparable temperatures (8 °C, 10 °C and 12 °C) were regulated to constant 8 °C after 30 days compared with the first experiment where feeding was carried out at the same constant temperatures (8 °C, 10 °C and 12 °C) during the whole experimental period.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2109.2002.00756.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Serious reduction in growth and health of Atlantic wolffish occurs at 15°C.

    “data indicate that serious reduction in growth and health of Atlantic wolffish occurs at 15°C (Árnason et al., 2019; Falk‐Petersen et al., 1999; Hansen & Falk‐Petersen, 2002).”

    From Insights into thermal sensitivity: Effects of elevated temperature on growth, metabolic rate, and stress responses in Atlantic wolffish (<i>Anarhichas lupus</i>) (2025) · cites this paper as Hansen & Falk‐Petersen, 2002

    The Results report sharply lower survival at 14°C and 16°C, and the Discussion reports inhibited growth at 16°C—but these findings concern first-feeding spotted wolffish larvae, not Atlantic wolffish. The paper did not test 15°C, and growth remained high through 14°C, so it does not establish a serious reduction in both growth and health of Atlantic wolffish at 15°C. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Elevated temperature has detrimental effects on both wolffish species.

    “Elevated temperature has detrimental effects on both wolffish species (Árnason et al., 2019; Falk‐Petersen et al., 1999; Hansen & Falk‐Petersen, 2002; McCarthy et al., 1998; Moksness, 1994; Pavlov & Moksness, 1997; Rindorf et al., 2020).”

    From Insights into thermal sensitivity: Effects of elevated temperature on growth, metabolic rate, and stress responses in Atlantic wolffish (<i>Anarhichas lupus</i>) (2025) · cites this paper as Hansen & Falk‐Petersen, 2002

    The Results and Discussion report that high temperatures reduced survival of first-feeding spotted wolffish larvae, and that growth was inhibited at 16°C. This paper studies spotted wolffish, not both wolffish species, so it does not establish the claim for the other species. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Growth of juvenile Atlantic wolffish was reduced at 15°C.

    “Consistent with earlier research (Árnason et al., 2019; Falk‐Petersen et al., 1999; Hansen & Falk‐Petersen, 2002), we demonstrated a reduction in growth at 15°C.”

    From Insights into thermal sensitivity: Effects of elevated temperature on growth, metabolic rate, and stress responses in Atlantic wolffish (<i>Anarhichas lupus</i>) (2025) · cites this paper as Hansen & Falk‐Petersen, 2002

    The Results and Discussion report inhibited growth at 16°C in first-feeding spotted wolffish larvae. They do not report a 15°C treatment or a finding for juvenile Atlantic wolffish, so the cited paper supports only the broader point that growth can decline at high temperatures. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Blaxter J.H.S. (1969) Development: eggs and larvae. In: Fish Physiology, Vol. III (ed. by W.S. Hoar & D.J. Randall), pp. 177±252. Academic Press, London.
  2. Blaxter J.H.S. (1980) Vision and feeding of fishes. In: Fish Behaviour and its Use in the Capture and Culture Fish (ed. by J.E. Bardach, J.J. Magnuson, R.C. May & J.M. Reinhart), pp. 32±56. ICLARM Conference Proceedings 5, Manila, Philippines.
  3. Blaxter J.H.S. (1988) Pattern and variety in development. In: Fish Physiology (ed. by W.S. Hoar & D.J. Randall), pp. 1±58. Academic Press, New York.
  4. Blaxter J.H.S. (1992) The effect of temperature on larval fishes. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 42, 336±357.
  5. Bredahl H. (2000) Startfo Ãring av flekksteinbit (Anarhichas minor Olafsen). Candidata scientiarium Thesis, Univer- sity of Tromsù, (in Norwegian).
  6. Brett J.R. (1970) Temperature-fishes. In: Marine Ecology, I. Environmental Factors, Part 1 (ed. by O. Kinne), pp. 515±560. Willey-Interscience, London.
  7. by W.S. Hoar, D.J. Randall & J.R. Brett), pp. 599±675. Academic Press, New York.
  8. Dabrowski K., Krumschnabel G., Paukku M. & Labanowski J. (1992) Cyclic growth and activity of pancreatic enzymes of Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) alevins. Journal of Fish Biology 40, 511±521.
  9. Falk-Petersen I.B. & Hansen T.K. (2001) Organ differenti- ation in newly hatched wolffishes. Journal of Fish Biology 59, 1465±1482.
  10. Falk-Petersen I.B., Haug T. & Moksness E. (1990) Observa- tions on the occurrence, size, and feeding of pelagic larvae of the common wolffish (Anarhichas lupus) in western Finnmark, northern Norway. Journal of Cons International Explor Mer 46, 148±154.
  11. Gulbrandsen J. (1991) Effect of Light Intensity on Feeding Success of Atlantic Halibut Larvae, in Larvi `91-Fish and Crustacean Larviculture Symposium (ed. by P. Lavens, P. Sorgeloos, E. Jaspers & F. Ollevier), European Aqua- culture Society. Special Publication 15, Gent, pp. 336±338.
  12. Hansen T.K. & Falk-Petersen I.B. (2002) Effects of egg disinfection and incubation temperature on early life stages of spotted wolffish (Anarhichas minor Olafsen). Aquaculture International (in press).
  13. Hendry C.I. & Halfyard L.C. (1998) The use of Artemia in feeding larval wolffish (Anarhichas lupus L.). Bulletin of Aquaculture Assosiation Canada 4, 27±29.
  14. Hunter J.R. (1981) Feeding ecology and predation of marine fish larvae. In: Marine Fish Larvae-Morphology, Ecology and Relation to Fisheries (ed. by R. Lasker), pp. 33±71. Washington Sea Grant Program.
  15. Jobling M. (1997) Temperature and Growth: Modulation of Growth Rate Via Temperature Change. In: Society for Experimental Biology Seminar Series 61: Global Warming: Implications for Freshwater and Marine Fish (ed. by C.M. Wood & D.G. McDonald), pp. 225±253. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  16. Johnston I.A. & McLay H.A. (1997) Temperature and family effects on muscle cellularity at hatch and first- feeding in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Canadian Journal of Zoology 75, 64±74.
  17. Johnston I.A., Cole N.J., Abercromby M. & Vieira V.L.A. (1998) Embryonic temperature modulates muscle growth characteristics in larval and juvenile herring. Journal of Experimental Biology 201, 623±646.
  18. Kamler E. (1992) `Early life history of fish. An energetic Approach'. Fish and Fisheries Series 4, pp. 267.
  19. Pepin P. (1991) Effect of temperature and size on develop- ment, mortality and survival rates of the pelagic early life history stages of marine fish. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48, 503±518.
  20. Reznick D.N. (1991) Maternal effects in fish life histories. Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of System- atic and Evolutionary Biology (ed. by E.C. Dudley), pp. 780±792. Dioscorides Press, Portland, OR.
  21. Ricker W.E. (1958) Handbook of computations for bio- logical statistics of fish populations. Journal of the Fisher- ies Research Board of Canada 119, 1±300.
  22. Rombough P.J. (1996) The Effects of Temperature on Em- bryonic and Larval Development. In. Society for Experi- mental Biology Seminar Series 61: Global Warming Implications for Freshwater and Marine Fish (ed. by C.M. Wood & D.G. McDonald), pp. 177±223. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  23. van der Kraak G. & Pankhurst N.W. (1996) Temperature Effects on the Reproductive Performance of Fish. In. Society for Experimental Biology Seminar Series 61: Global Warming Implications for Freshwater and Marine Fish (ed. by C.M. Wood & D.G. McDonald), pp. 159±176. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  24. Wiseman D.L. & Brown J.A. (1996) Early growth and survival of larval striped wolffish (Anarhichas lupus): a behavioural approach. Bulletin of the Aquaculture Associ- ation of Canada 96, 12±13.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hansen, T. K., & Falk-Petersen, I.-B.
Affiliations
UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Venue
Aquaculture Research
Published
2002-10-23
Volume
33
Issue
14
Pages
1119-1127
ISSN
1355-557X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1963603626
Cited by
37
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Aquaculture Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
spotted wolffish, Anarhichas minor, larval rearing, thermal regime, larval survival, larval growth, specific growth rate, formulated feed, aquaculture production, temperature regulation, marine fish culture, larval feeding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review