The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Foreland basin systems
Abstract
A foreland basin system is defined as: (a) an elongate region of potential sediment accommodation that forms on continental crust between a contractional orogenic belt and the adjacent craton, mainly in response to geodynamic processes related to subduction and the resulting peripheral or retroarc fold‐thrust belt; (b) it consists of four discrete depozones, referred to as the wedge‐top, foredeep, forebulge and back‐bulge depozones – which of these depozones a sediment particle occupies depends on its location at the time of deposition, rather than its ultimate geometric relationship with the thrust belt; (c) the longitudinal dimension of the foreland basin system is roughly equal to the length of the fold‐thrust belt, and does not include sediment that spills into remnant ocean basins or continental rifts (impactogens). The wedge‐top depozone is the mass of sediment that accumulates on top of the frontal part of the orogenic wedge, including ‘piggyback’ and ‘thrust top’ basins. Wedge‐top sediment tapers toward the hinterland and is characterized by extreme coarseness, numerous tectonic unconformities and progressive deformation. The foredeep depozone consists of the sediment deposited between the structural front of the thrust belt and the proximal flank of the forebulge. This sediment typically thickens rapidly toward the front of the thrust belt, where it joins the distal end of the wedge‐top depozone. The forebulge depozone is the broad region of potential flexural uplift between the foredeep and the back‐bulge depozones. The back‐bulge depozone is the mass of sediment that accumulates in the shallow but broad zone of potential flexural subsidence cratonward of the forebulge. This more inclusive definition of a foreland basin system is more realistic than the popular conception of a foreland basin, which generally ignores large masses of sediment derived from the thrust belt that accumulate on top of the orogenic wedge and cratonward of the forebulge. The generally accepted definition of a foreland basin attributes sediment accommodation solely to flexural subsidence driven by the topographic load of the thrust belt and sediment loads in the foreland basin. Equally or more important in some foreland basin systems are the effects of subduction loads (in peripheral systems) and far‐field subsidence in response to viscous coupling between subducted slabs and mantle–wedge material beneath the outboard part of the overlying continent (in retroarc systems). Wedge‐top depozones accumulate under the competing influences of uplift due to forward propagation of the orogenic wedge and regional flexural subsidence under the load of the orogenic wedge and/or subsurface loads. Whereas most of the sediment accommodation in the foredeep depozone is a result of flexural subsidence due to topographic, sediment and subduction loads, many back‐bulge depozones contain an order of magnitude thicker sediment fill than is predicted from flexure of reasonably rigid continental lithosphere. Sediment accommodation in back‐bulge depozones may result mainly from aggradation up to an equilibrium drainage profile (in subaerial systems) or base level (in flooded systems). Forebulge depozones are commonly sites of unconformity development, condensation and stratal thinning, local fault‐controlled depocentres, and, in marine systems, carbonate platform growth. Inclusion of the wedge‐top depozone in the definition of a foreland basin system requires that stratigraphic models be geometrically parameterized as doubly tapered prisms in transverse cross‐sections, rather than the typical ‘doorstop’ wedge shape that is used in most models. For the same reason, sequence stratigraphic models of foreland basin systems need to admit the possible development of type I unconformities on the proximal side of the system. The oft‐ignored forebulge and back‐bulge depozones contain abundant information about tectonic processes that occur on the scales of orogenic belt and subduction system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Yin, A., Dang, Y.-Q., Zhang, M., Chen, X.-H., & McRivette, M. W. (2008) · Geological Society of America Bulletin · doi:10.1130/b26232.1 · Cited by 561
NAJMAN, Y. (2005) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2005.04.004 · Cited by 441
Subsidence history, gravity anomalies and flexure of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) foreland basin
Ali, M. Y., & Watts, A. B. (2009) · GeoArabia · doi:10.2113/geoarabia140217 · Cited by 283
Cenozoic subsurface stratigraphy and structure of the Salar de Atacama Basin, northern Chile
Jordan, T. E., Mpodozis, C., Muñoz, N., Blanco, N., Pananont, P., & Gardeweg, M. (2007) · Journal of South American Earth Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2006.09.024 · Cited by 95
Nelson, L. L., Ramezani, J., Almond, J. E., Darroch, S. A. F., Taylor, W. L., Brenner, D. C., Furey, R. P., Turner, M., & Smith, E. F. (2022) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117396 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- DeCelles, P. G., & Giles, K. A.
- Venue
- Basin Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 105-123
- ISSN
- 0950-091X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2117
- OpenAlex
- W2012887763
- Cited by
- 1,557
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Foreland basin systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2117.1996.01491.x
- The paper
- DeCelles, P. G., & Giles, K. A. (1996). Foreland basin systems. Basin Research. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2117.1996.01491.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.