Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of multiple‐dose oral voriconazole

Open access
Purkins, Lynn, Wood, Nolan, Kleinermans, Diane, Greenhalgh, Katie, Nichols, Don·2003·British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Aims Voriconazole is a new triazole antifungal agent with activity against a range of clinically important and emerging pathogens. This study determined the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of voriconazole in healthy volunteers. Methods This was an open, randomized, two‐way crossover, multiple‐dose study in male volunteers. Twelve subjects received voriconazole 200 mg twice daily for 6.5 days. Each dose was administered either with food or in the fasted state, i.e. not within 2 h of food. Treatment periods were separated by a minimum 7‐day washout period. Plasma samples were taken for the estimation of voriconazole plasma concentrations on days 1 and 7. Safety and toleration were assessed by monitoring of both laboratory safety tests and adverse events. Results Administering voriconazole with food significantly decreased both day 7 AUC τ and Cmax by approximately 35% (9598–7520 ng·h ml−1;P = 0.003) and 22% (2038–1332 ng ml−1;P = 0.008), respectively. Administering voriconazole with food statistically significantly delayed absorption, evident from tmax values; the mean difference for tmax on day 7 was 1.1 h. The terminal phase rate constant was unchanged by administering voriconazole with food. The fasted terminal phase half‐life was 7.3 h compared with 6.6 h for the fed state. Visual inspection of Cmin values suggests that steady state was achieved after 5 days in both dietary states. Voriconazole accumulation, as assessed by ratios of Cmax and AUC τ on days 1 and 7, was statistically significantly greater when administered with food (Cmax,P = 0.010, AUC τ,P = 0.006). Mean Cmax accumulation in the fasted state was 2.1‐fold compared with 3.5‐fold in the fed state. AUC τ accumulation in the fasted state was 3.1‐fold compared with 4.2‐fold in the fed state. There were no discontinuations due to adverse events or laboratory abnormalities. Treatment‐related mild‐to‐moderate visual disturbances were experienced by six out of 12 subjects. Conclusions The bioavailability of twice‐daily 200 mg voriconazole is reduced by approximately 22% as measured by AUC τ after multiple dosing when taken with food, compared with fasting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01994.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 163

Metadata

Authors
Purkins, L., Wood, N., Kleinermans, D., Greenhalgh, K., & Nichols, D.
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-11-17
Volume
56
Issue
s1
Pages
17-23
ISSN
  • 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2125
OpenAlex
W1556593209
Cited by
163
References
1
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of multiple‐dose oral voriconazole. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01994.x
The paper
Purkins, L., Wood, N., Kleinermans, D., Greenhalgh, K., & Nichols, D. (2003). Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of multiple‐dose oral voriconazole. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01994.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.