Comparison of photodynamic therapy with cryotherapy in the treatment of Bowen's disease
Abstract
The efficacy and suitability of photodynamic therapy (PDT) was compared with that of cryotherapy in the treatment of 40 lesions of Bowen's disease. Lesions were randomized to receive either cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen, or PDT using a portable desktop lamp incorporating a 300 W xenon short arc discharge source. A porphyrin precursor, 5-aminolaevulinic acid (5-ALA), was applied topically 4 h before irradiation in the PDT group. Each lesion received 125 J/cm2 at a fluence rate of 70 mW/cm2. All patients were reviewed at 2-monthly intervals and treatments repeated if required. Cryotherapy produced clearance in 10 of 20 lesions after one treatment, the remaining 10 lesions requiring two or three treatment applications. PDT resulted in clearance of 15 of 20 lesions after one treatment and of the remaining five lesions after a second treatment. The probability that a lesion cleared after one treatment was greater with PDT than cryotherapy (P < 0.01). Cryotherapy was associated with ulceration (five of 20), infection (two of 20) and recurrent disease (two of 20); no such complications occurred following PDT. PDT using a non-laser light source and topical 5-ALA appears to be at least as effective as cryotherapy in the treatment of Bowen's disease with fewer adverse effects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma, compared with cryotherapy, ALA-PDT was more effective and better tolerated by patients.
“The encouraging results are also obtained in the treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma indicating that compared with cryotherapy, ALA-PDT was more effective and better tolerated by patients [116].”
From Aminolevulinic Acid (ALA) as a Prodrug in Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer (2011) · cites this paper as [116]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 306
- Authors
- MORTON, C. A., WHITEHURST, C., MOSELEY, H., MCCOLL, J. H., MOORE, J. V., & MACKIE, R. M.
- Affiliations
- Western Infirmary (GB)
- Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute (GB)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- ORCID
- MORTON, C.A.
- Venue
- British Journal of Dermatology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 766-771
- ISSN
- 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080795148
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- British Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Cancer and Skin Lesions
- Keywords
- photodynamic therapy, cryotherapy, Bowen's disease, 5-aminolevulinic acid, liquid nitrogen, treatment efficacy, adverse effects, recurrence
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bowen's Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Pain, Photochemotherapy, Skin Neoplasms, Treatment Outcome, Cryotherapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review