Cited by 306Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesCancer and Skin Lesions

Comparison of photodynamic therapy with cryotherapy in the treatment of Bowen's disease

MORTON, C.A., WHITEHURST, C., MOSELEY, H., MCCOLL, J.H., MOORE, J.V., MACKIE, R.M.·1996·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

The efficacy and suitability of photodynamic therapy (PDT) was compared with that of cryotherapy in the treatment of 40 lesions of Bowen's disease. Lesions were randomized to receive either cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen, or PDT using a portable desktop lamp incorporating a 300 W xenon short arc discharge source. A porphyrin precursor, 5-aminolaevulinic acid (5-ALA), was applied topically 4 h before irradiation in the PDT group. Each lesion received 125 J/cm2 at a fluence rate of 70 mW/cm2. All patients were reviewed at 2-monthly intervals and treatments repeated if required. Cryotherapy produced clearance in 10 of 20 lesions after one treatment, the remaining 10 lesions requiring two or three treatment applications. PDT resulted in clearance of 15 of 20 lesions after one treatment and of the remaining five lesions after a second treatment. The probability that a lesion cleared after one treatment was greater with PDT than cryotherapy (P < 0.01). Cryotherapy was associated with ulceration (five of 20), infection (two of 20) and recurrent disease (two of 20); no such complications occurred following PDT. PDT using a non-laser light source and topical 5-ALA appears to be at least as effective as cryotherapy in the treatment of Bowen's disease with fewer adverse effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1996.d01-1076.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma, compared with cryotherapy, ALA-PDT was more effective and better tolerated by patients.

    “The encouraging results are also obtained in the treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma indicating that compared with cryotherapy, ALA-PDT was more effective and better tolerated by patients [116].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 306

Authors
MORTON, C. A., WHITEHURST, C., MOSELEY, H., MCCOLL, J. H., MOORE, J. V., & MACKIE, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Western Infirmary (GB)
  • Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute (GB)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
1996-11
Volume
135
Issue
5
Pages
766-771
ISSN
0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080795148
Cited by
306
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Cancer and Skin Lesions
Keywords
photodynamic therapy, cryotherapy, Bowen's disease, 5-aminolevulinic acid, liquid nitrogen, treatment efficacy, adverse effects, recurrence
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bowen's Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Pain, Photochemotherapy, Skin Neoplasms, Treatment Outcome, Cryotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review