Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 315

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Staphylococcus aureus: colonizing features and influence of an antibacterial treatment in adults with atopic dermatitis

Breuer, K., HAussler, S., Kapp, A., Werfel, T.·2002·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The skin of up to 100% of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) is colonized with Staphylococcus aureus. Of all S. aureus strains isolated from lesional skin, up to 65% have been shown to produce exotoxins with superantigenic properties. Patients colonized with S. aureus have been treated with antibiotics in several open and double-blind placebo-controlled studies, with conflicting results. These studies did not consider the anterior nares as a reservoir of S. aureus, or the possibility of transmission between patients and their contacts. Moreover, adult patients have not so far been investigated. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the colonizing features of S. aureus in adults with AD and in their contacts, and the effect of an antimicrobial treatment of the patients and their partners. METHODS: Swabs were taken from the skin and anterior nares of 66 adults with AD. S. aureus strains were screened for the production of exotoxins in 32 patients. Ten patients (two with toxigenic strains, eight with non-toxigenic strains) were treated orally with cefalexin, chlorhexidine ointment was applied to the skin, and the anterior nares were treated with mupirocin ointment. A bath containing potassium permanganate was taken daily. In addition, their partners were treated topically. RESULTS: Sixty-two of 66 patients (94%) were carriers of S. aureus, and mostly harboured the bacteria on both skin and anterior nares. Ten of 32 (31%) patients were colonized with toxigenic strains. The Severity Scoring in AD (SCORAD) score decreased in nine of 10 patients who received antimicrobial treatment (P < 0.001), and this effect was more pronounced in patients with a baseline SCORAD > 50. CONCLUSIONS: S. aureus may play an important role as an aggravating factor in adults with AD, as antimicrobial treatment leads to a significant improvement of AD in patients who are colonized with the bacterium.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04872.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 315

Metadata

Authors
Breuer, K., HAussler, S., Kapp, A., & Werfel, T.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2002-07
Volume
147
Issue
1
Pages
55-61
ISSN
  • 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2133
OpenAlex
W1985669456
Cited by
315
References
1
FWCI
13.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Staphylococcus aureus: colonizing features and influence of an antibacterial treatment in adults with atopic dermatitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04872.x
The paper
Breuer, K., HAussler, S., Kapp, A., & Werfel, T. (2002). Staphylococcus aureus: colonizing features and influence of an antibacterial treatment in adults with atopic dermatitis. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04872.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.