The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blood viscosity and risk of cardiovascular events: the Edinburgh Artery Study
Open accessAbstract
We examined the relationships of whole blood viscosity and its major determinants to incident cardiovascular events (ischaemic heart disease and stroke) in a prospective study of a random population sample of 1592 men and women aged 55–74 years (the Edinburgh Artery Study). 272 fatal and non‐fatal cardiovascular events occurred during 5 years of follow‐up (cumulative incidence 17.1%). Age and sex adjusted mean levels of blood viscosity (3.70 v 3.55 mPa.s), haematocrit (46.2 v 45.7%), haematocrit‐corrected blood viscosity (3.57 v 3.48 mPa.s), plasma viscosity (1.35 v 1.33 mPa.s) and fibrinogen (2.88 v 2.67 g/l) were significantly higher in subjects who experienced events than in subjects who did not. The relationships of these rheological variables to cardiovascular events were at least as strong as those of conventional risk factors (smoking habit, diastolic blood pressure, and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol). After adjustment for these conventional risk factors, the associations of blood viscosity and haematocrit remained significant for stroke, but not for total events; whereas the associations of plasma viscosity and fibrinogen remained significant for total events and for stroke. These findings suggest that increased blood viscosity may be one plausible biological mechanism through which increases in haematocrit and fibrinogen may promote ischaemic heart disease and stroke. Randomized controlled trials of viscosity reduction in the prevention of cardiovascular events (e.g. by lowering high levels of haematocrit or plasma fibrinogen) are suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Heinrich, J., Balleisen, L., Schulte, H., Assmann, G., & van de Loo, J. (1994) · Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis: A Journal of Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/01.atv.14.1.54 · Cited by 563
Cited by
Rozanski, A., Blumenthal, J. A., & Kaplan, J. (1999) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.99.16.2192 · Cited by 2,846
Magnetically actuated microrobots as a platform for stem cell transplantation
Jeon, S., Kim, S., Ha, S., Lee, S., Kim, E., Kim, S. Y., Park, S. H., Jeon, J. H., Kim, S. W., Moon, C., et al. (2019) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aav4317 · Cited by 412
Danesh, J. (2000) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1053/euhj.1999.1699 · Cited by 339
Effects of Lifestyle on Hemostasis, Fibrinolysis, and Platelet Reactivity: A Systematic Review
Lee, K. W., & Lip, G. Y. H. (2003) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.163.19.2368 · Cited by 217
Why Is Androgen Replacement in Males Controversial?
Cunningham, G. R., & Toma, S. M. (2011) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2010-0266 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Lowe, G. D. O., Lee, A. J., Rumley, A., Price, J. F., & Fowkes, F. G. R.
- Venue
- British Journal of Haematology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 168-173
- ISSN
- 0007-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2141
- OpenAlex
- W2044332835
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blood viscosity and risk of cardiovascular events: the Edinburgh Artery Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.8532481.x
- The paper
- Lowe, G. D. O., Lee, A. J., Rumley, A., Price, J. F., & Fowkes, F. G. R. (1997). Blood viscosity and risk of cardiovascular events: the Edinburgh Artery Study. British Journal of Haematology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.8532481.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.