Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 475

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mean platelet volume is an independent risk factor for myocardial infarction but not for coronary artery disease

Endler, Georg, Klimesch, Alexandra, Sunder‐Plassmann, Heike, Schillinger, Martin, Exner, Markus, Mannhalter, Christine, Jordanova, Nelli, Christ, Günter, Thalhammer, Renate, Huber, Kurt, Sunder‐Plassmann, Raute·2002·British Journal of Haematology

Abstract

Summary. After rupture of an arteriosclerotic plaque in a coronary artery, platelets play a crucial role in the subsequent thrombus formation, leading to myocardial infarction. An increased mean platelet volume (MPV), as an indicator of larger, more reactive platelets, may represent a risk factor for myocardial infarction. However, this hypothesis is still controversial and most studies addressing the role of MPV were performed comparing patients suffering from myocardial infarction with healthy controls. We intended to identify patients at high risk of suffering myocardial infarction in a group of patients with known coronary artery disease. One hundred and eighty‐five consecutive patients with stable coronary artery disease were compared with 188 individuals who had suffered myocardial infarction. Patients within the highest quintile of MPV (≥ 11·6 fl) had a significantly higher risk of experiencing a myocardial infarction compared with patients within the lowest quintile (OR = 2·6, 95% CI 1·3–5·1) in a multivariate analysis that included sex, age, body mass index, hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, smoking and diabetes mellitus. Our results indicate that patients with pre‐existing coronary artery disease and an increased MPV (≥ 11·6 fl) are at higher risk of myocardial infarction. These patients can be easily identified during routine haematological analysis and could possibly benefit from preventive treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03441.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 475

Metadata

Authors
Endler, G., Klimesch, A., Sunder‐Plassmann, H., Schillinger, M., Exner, M., Mannhalter, C., Jordanova, N., Christ, G., Thalhammer, R., Huber, K., & Sunder‐Plassmann, R.
Venue
British Journal of Haematology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-04-25
Volume
117
Issue
2
Pages
399-404
ISSN
  • 0007-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2141
OpenAlex
W1994914810
Cited by
475
References
2
FWCI
3.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mean platelet volume is an independent risk factor for myocardial infarction but not for coronary artery disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03441.x
The paper
Endler, G., Klimesch, A., Sunder‐Plassmann, H., Schillinger, M., Exner, M., Mannhalter, C., Jordanova, N., Christ, G., Thalhammer, R., Huber, K., & Sunder‐Plassmann, R. (2002). Mean platelet volume is an independent risk factor for myocardial infarction but not for coronary artery disease. British Journal of Haematology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03441.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.